PEZ thoughts
I don't know how these diaries work, but I figured I'd try it out...
It's that slow-ish time of year, and I'm interested in brainstorming about certain ways that PEZ can improve.
Are there certain pieces of content that you'd like to see more of, different ideas, interview requests, thoughts, suggestions?
I love PodiumCafe to death and I highly respect your opinions, so that's why I'm asking here...so any help is greatly appreciated.
27 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
More Cycling History Articles
by David on Nov 13, 2007 11:39 AM EST reply actions
Fewer Ads Maybe?
What I read on Pez
- The interviews and diaries of the cyclists
- The stories of riding the course ahead of the peloton.
- Product reviews.
Horner
Don't read it
The inter-bike
But the photos of those surgically-enhanced people from Las Vegas remind me of doping in some strange way.
ON the other side of the page: beef up the pelo-pics. GWatson's page has dramatically faltered in coverage and quality in the last year or so and some of the Pez photos--especially the one Federico got of Ricco and Cunego in Lombardia--are as good as they get.
I have a sort of love/hate relationship with the product love-fests. I read 'em, and I appreciate the level of detail in the photos, but there is a level of overkill that they often reach. That and I don't understand the nokon fascination . . .
Pez was really good about getting good "beyond the publicist" feature interviews from riders. Those have gone away a little bit.
The euro-trash features just ain't the same since you stopped doing 'em. You actually had an attitude and a stance towards the major issues and riders (and acquired info. from places beyond the usual sources). That attitude is missing, which means that those pieces are not "must read" segments anymore.
Slightly off-topic aside...
The "real life" distractions are a lovely feature. It's really only fair when nearly every race report is a "daily distraction" for the girls in the audience.
Like duh, why do you think we're watching this sport?
Was that shallow? I think that might have been shallow, Gav...
More Cyclocross
I too, would like to know what is up with Chris Horner. He was supposed to have made a deal by the end of last week, but that does not seem to have happened. What's up with that?
As far as the distractions go, I am not offended in any way.
by Fink44 on Nov 13, 2007 3:03 PM EST reply actions
Ditto
by Drew on Nov 13, 2007 4:04 PM EST up reply actions
Ride reports from ordinary people
I agree on news -- i get plenty of EuroTrash from cyclingnews and eurosport.
My two pennies.
I love the Travel and Tours section with the information on cyclosportives, gran fondos, and touring companies that cater to the avid fan and rider. I can't afford any of these trips, but it's nice to dream. Also appreciate the cycling history, interviews, and pre-race course rides.
As for the ads, I recently purchased a frame due to one of the links to VeloVie. Love the bike, and Pez was my introduction to this new outfit.
Please don't get rid of the daily distractions. No one has to click on the link if they don't want to, so why be offended?
Lastly, I would like to see some stronger opinions on things. Hey, it really doesn't matter if I agree or not, but it sure makes for more interesting reading.
Keep up the great work. You guys are part of my daily routine.
by Eric V on Nov 13, 2007 3:43 PM EST reply actions
History
by liferaft on Nov 13, 2007 4:18 PM EST reply actions
Pez and Me
by Chris Fontecchio on Nov 13, 2007 5:55 PM EST reply actions
Me likey the Pez
I don't really go to Pez for news, although I do read the Eurotrash feature, because it's typically well-written and funny. I'm all about well-written and funny.
I'd love to see more interviews. Not to start a CN bashing session, but lately their writing/editing has taken a turn for the, well, excruciating, bordering on unreadable. (My tolerance for that sort of thing is a tad low, I confess.) Anywho, from where I'm sitting, there's space for more well-written, well-edited, English-language interviews out there on the interwebs. I get most of my interview fix by reading foreign sites. But given the choice, I'd really much rather read them in English. It's like easier and stuff.
I really enjoy the picture/narrative race coverage there at Pez. My fave feature, I think. I'd love to see those expanded with more detail. Fewer sites seem to be devoting time to writing good race reports - VN had a few really good ones last year, and Gazetta consistently nails it on the Italian races (they are Italian, they better know how to write about bike racing). Even if I've seen the race, I enjoy reading a well-written story about what happened. Especially if there are pictures. I like that you choose a series of pics that tell the story - rather than giving me everything on your hard drive. I'm not after massive quantities of information, but well-edited and stylish stories about cool races. More please!
Love the race previews. Love them. One of my fave things on the interwebs. About bike racing, that is. More please!
Another vote for some history stories, though I don't always read this kind of thing during the season. But I should, because then I wouldn't get so shelled at trivia games (sigh).
I tend not to read tech features. Maybe if I had more cash to burn ;-)
Awesome
I've got some responses milling about, and will get to replying a little later, but for now, I'm hungry and I just rode 5 hours. ha.
Likes and dislikes
I like the Eurotrash to some degree, but I think it shouldn't try to be up to the minute news - that is where it fails for me. When it looks at the weeks events in some kind of perspective, then it works.
The toolbox is probably my least important thing, but now and again it really has a good thing.
There is no easy way to go back and look at old articles, that I can find. I mean all of them.
Eurotrash +, grammar -
If there were a way you could tighten the screws a bit on editing & grammar, I wouldn't wince when I encounter the multiple boo-boos in most every article. :(
It may sound like I'm being picky, but correcting these regular goofs would make the presentation more professional.
Thanks for your enthusiasm!
-Greg
Thanks For Asking...
With Fast Freddie, Ivan Dominguez, Chris Horner (perhaps) and even Cippo (maybe) racing coast-to-coast this year, there's bound to be some exciting races that cycling fans can actually see in person (instead of watching crappy coverage on Versus or on a computer monitor, courtesy of cycling.tv).
by Chief Commissaire on Nov 14, 2007 9:12 AM EST reply actions
Distractions
Include women pro cyclists and fans as full participants in the sport and not as roadside attractions to be ogled.
by Nancy Toby on Nov 14, 2007 10:39 AM EST reply actions
who are you targeting?
by Nancy Toby on Nov 14, 2007 10:57 AM EST up reply actions
One more thought...
I liked the diary you did with, heh, who was it last year, team VAC, I think. That was cool. I'd love to see more domestic women's coverage when you can get it!
Interview with the new Road World Champion
http://interview.cyclingfever.com/index.html?_p=rider&id=16395&country=9
Dovetailing nicely
by Drew on Nov 15, 2007 8:33 AM EST reply actions
And please....
http://www.pezcyclingnews.com/?pg=dds/dds07/distractions-nov07
"PEZ-Fans get the hottest babes, so let's celebrate the WOMEN WE LOVE! Send us your pics - and make 'em sexy! That means No helmets & No glasses."
OK, that defines PEZ-Fans as males right there. Women need not apply. Plus women who are actually riding need not apply, so actual female cyclists are out, unless they fix up their helmet-head and pretty up for your camera.
Do you GET IT yet?? Can you understand why this might cause actual cyclists and cycling fans who happen to be female to be offended and avoid the site? Do you think it's a sound marketing plan to offend a significant proportion of your potential viewership?
OK, off my soapbox now.
by Nancy Toby on Nov 15, 2007 10:16 AM EST reply actions

by 








