Contador Gobbles Up The 2008 Golden Bike Award
The Vélo d'Or, THE end of season award in cycling, was just won by The Accountant for the second year in a row. I happen to love this award as I love all of these types of end of season awards that are decided by journalists. To me these types of awards (MVP awards, Golden Boot for Euro soccer player of the year, etc.) tracked over the years, tends to give a good snapshot of who is dominating their given sport during any time period.
But these awards show more than just which player is at the top of his/her game, they also show a maturity in the sport, and a sense that the sport has a certain level of infrastructure in the society that its based in. That Velo magazine can get a bunch of cycle journalists from different countries to vote for rider of the year is not as simple as it sounds. It implies that there is sufficient interest in the sport from the public allowing the publication and selling of enough cycling magazines in turn providing jobs for enough journalists who can concentrate on following the sport we love 24/7.
The history of the Golden Bike also shows that cycling is a new sport. Its much younger than the larger, more established sports, going back only to '92. Yeah I know that various races are 100 years old or more. Most every sport today goes back 100 years or more, sometimes much more. But there's always a gap between when the sport was first thought up and having the infrastructure built so that millions of people can enjoy watching the best participants excel and for cycling that gap is quite long. And its interesting that In spite of the doping scandals, cycling has seriously grown in the past 50 years, allowing it to move beyond a provincial Euro thing to a worldwide sport, followed by millions. And it continues to grow as blogs like this one attest. Speaking of blogs...
Having said these high faluttin words, the Golden Bike of course comes after our award of Rider of the Year and its interesting to see how closely we agree once you throw out the differences between the awards: The Podium Cafe voting included women cyclists, while Velo magazine's award includes cross, track, and mountain bikers as well- but no women evidently. Here's how the voting went for both awards:
| Velo Mag Ranking | Velo Points | Podium Cafe Ranking | PdC Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.Contador | 72 | 1.Contador | 163 |
| 2. Cancellara | 47 | 2. Cancellara | 114 |
| 3. Sastre | 36 | 3. Cavendish | 48 |
| 4. Valverde | 34 | 4. Vandevelde | 20 |
| 5. Cavendish | 31 | 5. Valverde | 16 |
| 6. Ballan | 21 | 6. Cunego | 14 |
| 7. Cunego | 8 | 7. Gilbert | 10 |
| 8. Boonen | 6 | 8. Sastre | 7 |
| 9. Gilbert | 4 | 9. Ballan | 1 |
Obviously PdC has an America/English bias; that's to be expected. Otherwise the voting is similar. Maybe they just copied us. ;)
So who might win next year?
13 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Hmm.. Funny fact..
Last year Contador won The Velo d’Or..
His perfomances:
Tour de France win
Parijs-Nice win
All I can remember. Please correct me when I’m wrong.
This year:
Sastre
Tour de France win
Vuelta 3rd..
Can someone explain the weird situation?
Some say the best things in life, are one the inside.
I see it..
Though the PdC list was the official lsit..
Some say the best things in life, are one the inside.
Won every Grand Tour he was in
That is the difference. Contador won every grand tour he was invited to. Sastre didn’t, and didn’t win head to head in a grand tour with Contador. I loved the Tour de France this year and Sastre won deservedly but the field was below par on purpose.
Sastre
won because he stayed in contention and CSC played the royal flush of cycling on the Alpe d’Huez stage. Contador won everything he entered in 2009, while completing the shortest grand tour circuit of all time. Between these two, it’s not really even close.
Not the shortest grand tour sweep of all time
I agree that Contador is the rightful winner of rider-of-the-year awards for 2008, but his 14-month grand tour sweep has been misreported as the shortest of all time.
Eddy Merckx won the 1972 Tour and the 1973 Giro and Vuelta. The ‘72 Tour ran from July 1-23. The ’73 Vuelta ran from April 26 to May 13, and the ’73 Giro ran from May 18 to June 9. That’s all three grand tour wins in less than 12 months.
by Susie Hartigan on Nov 28, 2008 3:49 PM EST up reply actions
rule no. 1
fabian cancellara can finish no lower than third.
CQRanking.com, you complete me.
by Chris Fontecchio on Nov 27, 2008 12:23 PM EST reply actions
Well, yeah.
I think there is a law somewhere to that effect of Spartacus finishing no lower than 3rd.
Plus
we vote with our hearts. Journalists vote to impress other journalists.
CQRanking.com, you complete me.
by Chris Fontecchio on Nov 27, 2008 1:01 PM EST reply actions
Settle down Chris....
Its a holiday and all.
lol
I remember in the 1st Bill James Historical baseball abstract a study by him about the relation of the MVP vote and the Hall of Fame. Quite a fascinating study; makes me want to try the same with the Golden Bike if I can find the vote totals for each year. Which leads me into looking at the Cycling Hall of fame.com’s rankings and how they rank the riders which I don;t agree with at all.
Cavendish really...
It was Eurovision time for the British journalist in this year’s Velo d’Or with top points going to Cavendish…..really now?















