Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: An Explanation For Some Of The Perplexing HOF Snubs

The Tour's first scandal

Star-divide

The Tour de France, cycling's most prestigious race, has been around since 1903, and endured its first scandal in 1904. That year saw the top four overall finishers and all stage winners disqualified and banned by the French Cycling Union (UVF - at the time the national governing body). Sounds bad enough as scandals go, right? But this happened after the organizer of the Tour threw out nine other riders for some sort of cheating (the Wiki entry doesn't specify all the infractions, but does note that at least some were for hopping trains).

The recent struggles for control of racing have a 1904 precedent as well. Then the Tour organizer disciplined riders as he saw fit, expecting that to be the end of the story. Several months later the UVF opened its own investigation, and on its own authority banned many of France's top riders.

The UVF's actions may have been an opportunity to claim jurisdiction over all aspects of French cycling (warning: major speculation alert). Just as the US Supreme Court used the case of Marbury v. Madison early in the nation's history to establish the principle of judicial review over all branches of the federal government, it may be that the UVF used the controversy to display and cement its authority over the totality of French cycling.

Does all that maneuvering sound familiar? This year saw the Court of Arbitration for Sport refuse a request from a group representing several professional cycling teams for injunctive relief against the International Cycling Union (UCI) and the group (ASO) that stages many of the world's premier races - including the Tour de France. In this case the ASO was on the side of the pro teams despite being lumped in with the UCI. The UCI and ASO have been squabbling for years over power and money.

As for what the riders banned by the UVF in 1904 were guilty of, no one seems to know. The Wiki entry mentions illegal agreements but offers no evidence. A cycling historian is tackling the subject for his thesis; his judgment will be written up and published, hopefully as a book along the lines of Cod, or Close to Shore - books which include plenty of historical context about the events they describe. The story as known is written up by cycling's premier journalist, the International Herald Tribune's Samuel Abt.

Comment 0 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Every sprint, every cobble, every mountain pass from the world of Pro Cycling

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Rocky_small
The day before "the decision": What are you hoping for?
Dauphine_liberee_08_small
Hoogstraten CX - LIVE!
Torre_small
Lille CX... Live
Small
Pre FSA Directeur Sportif Deadline Race: GP Costa degli Etruschi is On Today
Img_6045_small
Lance - Investigation closed, no charges to follow.
Small
Podium Kit
Small
Team Fashion Parade - Lotto Belisol
30102_394659898780_714513780_3911404_852720_n_small
O/T: How Good is St-Sixtus Westvleteren Ale?
4438577767_3a37510f57_t_small
UCI takes away Kathryn Bertine's Olympic qualifying points
Silverlake_cx_0144_20111113t143153_cropped_small
Niels Albert plays in the sand!

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Another Cancer Survivor

Recent FanShots

Millano-Torino is back
racing on Cauberg this weekend!
Snow ride! Yum yum.
Cycling finally gets some love in main stream media
Score 1 for Lance
What cyclist say 2ND part..!
Presenting the Ukrainian National Champion
ladies tour of qatar st. 2 results
Should I believe this countdown?

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

30102_394659898780_714513780_3911404_852720_n_small Chris Fontecchio

Espresso_cup_small Jen See