Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Nevin Shapiro Vows To Bring Down Miami

The Story of Shifting

The Story of Shifting

The story of shifting is quite an intriguing one with the Penny Farthing the basis of shifting. The Penny Farthings Cranks were attached to the wheel. This meant the  rollout or how far the bike would move in one rotation of the pedals was all about the size of the wheel.

After the death of the penny farthing and the beginning of the then called safety bicycle the transmission was via a chain driven by a crankset. This meant that different ratios of gears could be used by altering the number of teeth on the sprockets or cogs on the rear wheel or the teeth on the front chainring. Bicycles from the late 1800’s to the 1930’s could have two gears with a sprocket on either side of the wheel. Those gears would be typically a flat gear and a hill gear.

The next important inovation was the what happened after the scene on the Croce D'Aune Pass in 1927. Tulio Campagnolo was in a chance to win the Gran Premio della Vittoria when he tried to change into his climbing gear. The axle nuts were frozen so he was unable to change gear. This cost the promising racer a chance at victory this brought a string of inventions that would improve gear shifting. It was on that mountain he muttered the legendary quote in cycling folklore “Something has to be changed in the rear”. He meant by this a new way of changing gear that was quicker and easier. What he did although quite a small change was to invent the quick release skewer. The skewer allowed quick wheel changes without much effort.

The next big innovation in cycling was only 10 years later with the creation of the Cambio Corsa rod gears . This worked with two rods. One was a quick release lever and the other was a rod that was used to push the chain before the days of the derailleur. Without the derailleur the dropouts would have to be long to take the slack out of the chain. How this would work is that the rider would open the quick release lever so that the wheel could move freely around the dropouts. Then the rider would push the chain onto a different sprocket and then let the chain take up the slack in the chain then you would close the quick release and then the shift was complete.

A few years after Tulio Campagnolo created the Roubaix gear shifter that combined The quick release lever and the chain pusher in one. However this didn’t last long because a couple of years later he created the Gran Sport derallieur. This was one of the single most important invoations in cycling. Put it simple it revolutionzed cycling. This meant that that the rod shifter could be replaced with downtube levers. That meant better ease of use and faster shifting as well as being more smooth with less rubbing of the chain.

Then after twenty years of innovation the changing stopped. It wasn’t that nothing improved it was just that there was no big change. The amount of gears increased as well as speed of shifting but in comparison there was no change. There has from then to now only one major innovation in cycling. Electronic shifting. The Japanese have added another innovation against the Campagnolo Italians. Electronic shifting is more efficient with the system run by a computer it makes little adjustments to the chain and overshifts to make a more efficient shift.

As you can see the technology has changed a huge amount since the now ancient Penny Farthing. Now are we at the peak can we improve the technology? There isn’t much we can think of but like the 40 year gap between Derallieurs and Dual Integration Levers not much happened. Could we say there will be another big gap in innovation all we can do is improve what we know. So that’s the story of shifting from the humble penny farthing to the Japanese computer shifting.

James Moffat

Comment 28 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Oh, my.

I’m sure you’re working on the formatting now, but for the future, may I suggest the Preview function before posting?

Looks like you copied and pasted from Word? One quick way to remove code is to copy your text from Word and paste it into Notepad, then copy it again from Notepad and paste it again into the post you’re creating here. Only takes a few seconds. You’ll lose any formatting, but can recreate most of it fairly quickly.

Good luck cleaning this up!

It was just a long race--Edvald Boasson Hagen, on the Giro

by majope on Dec 2, 2009 11:06 PM EST reply actions  

I cleaned it up

just took a moment. But James, do use the preview first.

"Harder! Better! Faster! Stronger!" Philippe Gilbert

by Chris Fontecchio on Dec 3, 2009 2:20 AM EST up reply actions  

Can't wait to read this

May even be so tempted I wade through the formatting text. Looks wonderful!

by Douglas Ansel on Dec 3, 2009 12:40 AM EST reply actions  

That formatting was riveting =]...

I shall come back to read when it is a bit more clean

by Vlaanderen90 on Dec 3, 2009 2:18 AM EST reply actions  

Nice overview, Jim

And well structured, too :-).

I am sure that the argument(/s) will also be instructive, LOL. (OK, I could be wrong… but it’s the off-season, everyone is stir-crazy, and I just have a hunch that there will be a shifting-related argument happening here shortly…)

by Lou... on Dec 3, 2009 4:39 AM EST reply actions  

An interesting article

Though where do hub gears fit into this?

Sturmey-Archer introduced their first three-speed hub gear in 1902. I always thought this was fairly irrelevant to racing but apparently Lucien Petit-Breton rode one in the 1913 Tour de France: http://www.sturmey-archerheritage.com/detail.php?id=200

Interesting the that the technology hadn’t reached Italy or that it was never considered better than flipping the wheel – presumably the weight penalty was too great?

by thebongolian on Dec 3, 2009 5:07 AM EST reply actions  

some people are working on

“analog” gearing – in other words an infinite “number” of gears. Was a small german company that i read about a few years ago – they had developed some expensive prototypes was all. Don’t know if that will ever go anywhere or not. Sounds good though.

by yeehoo on Dec 3, 2009 6:36 AM EST reply actions  

There are some interesting videos of that on YouTube

but I don’t think that I’d be keen on a transmission system that relied on a liquid magically turning solid at crucial moments.

by Monty. on Dec 4, 2009 5:41 PM EST up reply actions  

Electric shift feels dirty

I have alwayss felt, for admittedly irrational reasons, that electric shifting is wrong (for racing anyway). Muscle power should be used to do anything that adjusts the power output of the bike. There are good points to be made otherwise, but still it just feels wrong to me.

In terms of new types of gearing, I don’t see why belt drive adjusted continuous hasn’t been developed more. seems like it could be lighter and simpler. I see some town bikes have this, at least the belt drive.

by Markk on Dec 3, 2009 1:14 PM EST reply actions  

I know why belt drive has not developed... If your going fast and you go over rough road, you have a big chance of breaking the belt

Same goes for really steep hills. The belt would also be an akward piece to shift as well which is why they just have it on commuter bikes with internal gearing or singlespeed bikes. I would be curious to see prototypes but it is definitely a long road.

WIth the electronic shifting, you still have to shift the gears it is just much faster. Though I am in the same boat as you. I will never let electronic shifting be on my bike.

by Vlaanderen90 on Dec 3, 2009 2:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Belt drive is less efficient . . . .

 . . . . so are continuous transmissions.

Those are just a plain facts.

by Ryan_Liles on Dec 3, 2009 6:41 PM EST up reply actions  

according to wikipedia...

a chain drive system can be between 75-97% efficient and shaft drive is typically 95% efficient

(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drive_shaft – opens in new window)

by thebongolian on Dec 4, 2009 9:23 AM EST up reply actions  

Huh

That list of pros & cons left me entirely unconvinced. Most pros seem contrived anti-chain. Efficiency of 94% seems very high, I wonder if that includes the hub gears, I think not. One problem not mentioned is the high force needed to keep the shaft & cogs together (the “bevel gears”). Might not be enough for strong cyclists.

by tedvdw on Dec 4, 2009 10:01 AM EST up reply actions  

With shafts, there are two main problems -

1 – Weight is ALWAYS going to be higher then a chaindrive.
 
2 – Friction is ALWAYS going to be greater then a properly cared for chaindrive.

by Ryan_Liles on Dec 4, 2009 11:11 PM EST up reply actions  

The reason I ask

is I’m surprised you don’t see more of them on ordinary everyday bikes where the cleanliness and ease of care could be a major selling point.

by Jens on Dec 5, 2009 2:00 AM EST up reply actions  

economies of scale?

lots of people creating chains etc. means it’s cheaper – plus you’ve got to persuade people to buy something that looks a little odd

by thebongolian on Dec 5, 2009 5:12 AM EST up reply actions  

Hub gear, full chain guard

drop of oil every two years. What’s the saving there

by Monty. on Dec 6, 2009 6:01 AM EST up reply actions  

Oh sure

if you wanna use facts.

The kind of tech that people (men mostly) adapt has sometimes vey little to do with rationality. I could just picture the shaft drive to be very marketable to mainstream , non-bikefreak users. The identification with a tried and tested car-technology not least being very attractive to a certain crowd.

by Jens on Dec 6, 2009 6:24 AM EST up reply actions  

I've seen a couple of shaft-drive bikes on sale

and they look like the sort of thing your grandad might buy (might, until he saw the price tag. How much? I remember when you could get a brand new car, a dirty weekend in Stockholm and almost a whole bottle of whisky for that price … ). Flashy, full-suspension shit is a lot easier to sell to the kids, with all of those big chunky springs and hinges.

by Monty. on Dec 6, 2009 6:36 AM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Every sprint, every cobble, every mountain pass from the world of Pro Cycling

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Already dreaming of the Giro
White_unicorn_160_x_160_small
Need help picking your FSA Directeur Sportif team? Ask the unicorns!
Small
FSA DS for Dummies
Javino_small
Five Newbies to Watch for 2012
Bike_flag_small
I'm the best f******g sprinter in the world
Torre_small
Project PdC Runway - the new kit edition (+poll)
Pdc_5a_small
PdC’s Trivia Monday Quiz #14
White_unicorn_160_x_160_small
Happy Hour Over Here
Small
[Techs Mechs] Darn Tough Socks: Hammer in Style
Rocky_small
The day before "the decision": What are you hoping for?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Another Cancer Survivor

Recent FanShots

A frozen 'cross ride from this last weekend. As you may be aware we have had siberian conditions here in the UK with a low of -14 degrees centigrade here on saturday morning. It was a beautiful sunny morning so i layered up and set off for a snowy 'cross ride along a roman road. I checked the thermometer when i got back to find it had been -10 throughout the ride! I had a lot of fun though and the views were spectacular.
Oh come on
Cowmouflage - Walt "Clyde" Frazier raises the bar
1 week and 4 days to go..! Are you ready?
Spanish government may sue French TV for doping skits
This is funny on so many levels. [Html should open bigger]
New 2012 World Tour stage race in China
Interesting interview with Cancellara
TRANSFORMERS...!!!
scientific american article on plasticizer testing

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

30102_394659898780_714513780_3911404_852720_n_small Chris Fontecchio

Espresso_cup_small Jen See