Back Pocket Previews '09: Silence! Lotto
I would love to see a graph of who spends what in the Pro Tour, along with some analysis of returns on the dollar. Silence-Lotto strike me as a well-funded team, and have the extra good fortune of fronting for Omega-Pharma, something of a giant Belgian pharmaceutical company, who no doubt enjoy the prestige of having their name attached to an elite Cycling squad. What's more, Silence-Lotto have generally played the role of Belgian representative to the racing world outside Flanders, unable to pry Quick Step off its home-field perch. Silence can be seen at the front of the Tour de France, the Ardennes races, the Giro di Lombardia, etc. Assuming Omega sell their stuff outside the motherland, their investment is bringing very nice returns. Oh, and the Lotto half of the name represents the Belgian national lottery company, a perma-sponsor who have invested in the sport since before the invention of the inflatable tire.
But other than generally hoping for the best for Cycling's bottom line, I couldn't care less about this. I care about who delivers on the road, and here's where Silence's performance starts to unravel. Marc Sergeant has employed a formula that could be described as the anti-Lefevre strategy: spreading resources across every discipline, without concentrating on any. Since 2006 Cadel Evans has captained the Tour team, usually with a token lieutenant. Robbie McEwen was the designated sprinter. Peter Van Petegem headed the classics team until Leif Hoste signed on. The result has been plenty of points and a team ranking in the latter half of the top ten... not too shabby if you don't care about wins. I do, however... which is why Silence Lotto don't do much for me. On with the show.
Attributes: While Silence continue to focus on top talent supported by nobody in particular, they do get some credit for their offseason signings: Philippe Gilbert and Thomas Dekker. The latter is an all-rounder with a proven record in chronos and short stage races, while the former is a cobbles stud and Cycling's version of the energizer bunny (non-Jens! edition). Help is also coming up through the ranks in the form of Greg Van Avermaet, who arrived ahead of schedule last year, and Jurgen Van Den Broeck, a talented climber scheduled to arrive any moment now. Taken together and you have a climbing team of Evans, VDB and Dekker, and a classics squad manned by Hoste, Gilbert and Van Avermaet. Some very nice chess pieces. Also, McEwen's move to Katyusha nixes the sprint squad, which allows them a better chance to concentrate on doing a few things well.
Problems: A trio of potential leaders are only as powerful as their willingness to devote themselves to the team. Individually, Hoste is a perpetual second, Gilbert is an overly aggressive attacker, and Van Avermaet is unproven on the tougher classics course. Together, you have two long-range weapons and a sprinter if the race doesn't break up before the finale. In the hills, Evans is a podium guy rather than a winner, Dekker comes in with a big pedigree and bum rep, and Van den Broeck is still a tad young. There simply is no indication that the new plan will work, until it actually does. And finally Evans can't expect to be any less exposed in July than he was last year, when he didn't have to contend with the Astana Armada.
Key Rider: Dekker. Actually, this team is lousy with massive wild-card types. But to me Dekker is the wildest. Van Avermaet and Gilbert are known quantities looking for marginal improvements. Dekker is a mega-star talent whose career jumped the rails last year, for reasons not too well known. Someone dropped hints of doping suspicion, and if nothing else Rabobank's allergic reaction to bad press undoubtedly played a role in the fallout. Dekker has Due Mari and Romandie wins to his credit, went 5th-5th-6th in the Ardennes last year, and won't celebrate his 25th birthday til after the Giro. This is a guy who could do something big, soon... if he flies right, and if he's not tainted.
Key Moment(s): Something good has to happen to bring these guys together as a team, and while that could be any day, I'll go with Gent-Wevelgem, April 8. If this race comes together after the Kemmelberg, the fast finishers will take over. Except Oscar Freire won't be there, and Mark Cavendish is an uncertain threat for a win over this demanding course. Van Avermaet will go in as a top threat to win, and might even get some assistance from his famous (and/or less-heralded) mates.
Passing Thought: I make similar complaints about Rabobank: lots of talent and effort applied toward lord-knows-what. But Rabo have a couple distinct advantages. First, Denis Menchov has two grand tour titles to his name, and Rabo acquitted themselves well in the 2007 Tour before the ~:> came home to roost. If the almost-great Evans didn't fling himself exclusively at the Tour every year, he too could have some huge stage-racing wins to his name. Secondly, Rabobank are starting to enjoy the fruits of a 13-year investment in youth and junior cycling, and the current team is being taken over by a new generation that has never known anything but success. Rabobank are turning the corner, possibly rather quickly. Silence-Lotto... I just don't know if there is a new dawn on the horizon yet.
24 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Dekker & Gilbert
What more can a team want hehehe Well my Team anyway..Ohh I can get Van Avermaet and stubbe too..
This Team is in my top 3, Love them…
Ohhh and my sources say, nothing to do with Drugs, and more to do with Dekker’s ummm Let’s say he loves having fun ;-))
We don't stop playing because we grow old, we grow old because we stop playing.
George Bernard Shaw, 1856-1950
chaos
They are a nice team but chaotic. The management has essentially remained the same, despite plenty of bad recruitment decisions and tactical mistakes. The team is backwards when it comes to training and supervising their riders, they are often left to train by themselevs, no SRMs or sports science advice.
With Lotto backing the team permanently it makes the management lazy, they don’t seek to maximise every angle. Compare them to Garmin, for example, a smaller team with a smaller budget but a lot more success because they focus on achievement, not mediocrity.
Sorry if this is harsh but they get outclassed every year and if coming second or third is still an excellent results, they ignore the means to make improvements, they could do so much better and that’s the frustrating bit.
Wow, the old "let's stick to what we've always done"-problem
Haven’t heard it bout *Lotto before but it makes sense. Weird how this seems to be holding back so many teams (french in particular).
Did your favourite rider just win Montepaschi Strade Bianch Eroica Toscana? OK then.
“a smaller budget but a lot more success”
Uh, no.
Not by a long shot could Garmin be slated as having better success last year.
Nope, sorry but a bunch of top tens don’t equal even what Evans did in major races.
Not to mention everyone else on Lotto.
Look, I know many here are super up on the Burrito Boys, but let’s keep it all in context, ok?
in context
Yes, it’s about the context. I didn’t mean Garmin is a better squad, just that they seem to be pursuing every watt, second and placing possible with an analytical approach. At Lotto this just isn’t the case and they could be doing so much better. When a major race can be decided in seconds or by a 10 watt difference, team management have to work hard here. So like I say, Lotto aren’t all bad, no way. It’s just they could be doing even better…
And Jens, the French teams are upping their game now. Cofidis has bought SRMs for its riders and employs a full time coach on the staff and they might be recruiting an assistant coach. Bouygues has just done the same, SRMs and a pro coach.
by TheInnerRing on Mar 12, 2009 7:27 AM EDT up reply actions
Shall I compare thee to a summer's day?
Thou art more lovely and kiss more podium girls.
Evans was a workhorse last year, but he notched three stage wins and one stage race overall in 2008.
Garmin, as a squad, notched significantly more victories than Evans alone. Three lesser stage race victories and five stages, plus a passel of other minor stuff. Admittedly, Garmin wasn’t smokin’ up first places, but it did outperform Silence’s captain.
Both squads need to concentrate on actually winning races, rather than animating breakaways and waving their arms in desperation.
Lotto
17th in wins last year, I believe? One of the points I’d meant to make. 7th in points, 17th in wins. IOW, they get by on Evans’ Tour podium score. Color me uninspired.
CQRanking.com, you complete me.
by Chris Fontecchio on Mar 12, 2009 9:53 AM EDT up reply actions
Adding
I do appreciate Evans, he’s made himself into a great cyclist. I’m glad he got his full shot at a Tour title last year, even though he and Sastre were both in about the same career position, trying to squeeze out a single win before the Contador era shut them all down, and Sastre had more help. Evans may be a strange guy, but he deserves a ton of credit for his success.
CQRanking.com, you complete me.
by Chris Fontecchio on Mar 12, 2009 9:56 AM EDT up reply actions
Their budget is smaller then you would think.
In fact Marc Sergeant prides himself on this as a key reason he has been able to keep Lotto alive for so long.
Go look it up.
If memory serves me, Silence-Lotto’s budget was one of the smallest in the Pro Tour rankks.
’Course, that was a few years ago now, but I dobt that it has really changed very much.
Maybe that used to be true, but it doesn't seem to be now.
Team Budgets 2008 (in millions of dollars, U.S,)
Source: VeloNews Official Guide to the Tour de France, so no Astana, but they’re rumored to be very well-funded. Assuming they’re among the top budgets along with Rabo and Cofidis ($15.6 million each) and QS ($13.25), Lotto’s $11.75 still puts them fifth.
Ag2r-La Mondiale: $11.37
Bouygyues: $11
Caisse d’Epargne: $11
Cofidis: $15.6
Credit Agricole: $10
CSC-Saxo Bank: $11
Euskaltel-Euskadi: $9.4
Francaise des Jeux: $10
Gerolsteiner: $11
Columbia: $11.7
Lampre: $9
Liquigas: $9
Milram: $11
Quick Step: $13.25
Rabobank: $15.6
Saunier Duval: $9
Silence Lotto: $11.75
(Agritubel: $5.75
Barloworld: $5.5
Garmin: $11—these 3 were the Pro Conti teams in the Tour—the rest are Pro Tour)
He has no charisma--Thomas Dekker, on Cadel Evans
And
this was before adding Gilbert and Dekker, so they’re not poor.
CQRanking.com, you complete me.
by Chris Fontecchio on Mar 12, 2009 9:57 AM EDT up reply actions
I never said they were poor, but they are also not throwing around huge money either.
It looks to me like they are in the sweet spot of the Pro Tour teams budgets.
Regarding the acquisition of Gilbert and Dekker – remember that Popovich, Cioni, and a few others left?
I would bet the team budget is if anything may be less due to the economics of this year.
Maybe
I’m not sure we disagree on anything, though your guess about this year isn’t what I’d guess. Hopefully someone will dredge up another round of team budget figures.
CQRanking.com, you complete me.
by Chris Fontecchio on Mar 12, 2009 12:09 PM EDT up reply actions
Don't believe the stats..
Or better say.. They out of date.. Or old…
Crashdan: "Veni Vidi Vici beats Wing Kong Exchange... … and I’ll change my signature to a backwards smile for a month."
Franzoi wins Parijs-Roubaix and I win a date with the VDS of Team Txirrindulariak..
Great post,
I haven’t mentioned it before but Iove reading these, especially as someone who has become far more of a cycling fan only recently (last couple of years or so) after a long hiatus. This stuff gets me caught up and ready to watch. (Wow did that every sound lazy!)
By the way I think before his career’s out, Gilbert is going to do some damage in the Ardennes. And I bet it’s at Liège. Maybe not now, on the same team as Dekker… But before he’s done, I bet he wins the Doyenne at least once, maybe Flèche and Amstel too.
I want to make a bet with you..
He’s never gonna win LBL or Fleche Wallonie
Crashdan: "Veni Vidi Vici beats Wing Kong Exchange... … and I’ll change my signature to a backwards smile for a month."
Franzoi wins Parijs-Roubaix and I win a date with the VDS of Team Txirrindulariak..
Think you're right about Liège
I’m not seeing him making the climbs or having a fast enough finish to win that one. Flèche-Wallon might be possible, though. Is he maybe too heavy for that final climb? Heh, I’m not convinced of Gilbert in the Ardennes by any means. Intrigued, but not convinced.
* Lotto announced their team for the Giro
according to sporza, 7 of the 9 are Belgians:
* Philippe Gilbert
* Bart Dockx
* Christophe Brandt
* Francis De Greef
* Pieter Jacobs
* Tom Stubbe
* Jelle Vanendert
* Matthew Lloyd (Aus)
* Jonas Ljungblad (Zwe)
the article goes on to say that because their Giro team doesn’t have a true sprinter they’ll more be focussing on stage wins, but that Lloyd and De Greef could possibly do well in the mountains to get a good overall ranking. And I’m presuming that after Gilbert overcomes his current acidity problem in his legs, then does Flanders plus the Ardennes Classics then the Giro then he’ll be due for a long-ish break? (think they announced long ago he wouldn’t be riding the Tour IIRC). Presumably, Van Den Broeck and Dekker are going to be on the same training plan as Evans for the Tour.
So
all in for the Tour then? Fine, I’m sure their sponsor likes that plan. Also, there’s some logic to making VDB do support work at the Tour rather than having him captain the Giro team. You could say the same about Lloyd and De Greef, but they’re relatively young and anonymous, and can just ride their own race.
CQRanking.com, you complete me.
by Chris Fontecchio on Mar 12, 2009 6:28 PM EDT up reply actions
I'm sure their sponsors like 7 of 9 Belgians too ;-)
… for the Giro. That (# of Belgians) seems to be a factor for the * Lotto Tour team IMO the last few years … if there are slots up for grabs for general worker-bees they’re most likely to be Belgians it seemed (though, admittedly the majority of their riders are Belgian). Probably atm I’d be guessing a Tour team of Evans, Dekker, VDB, Vansummeren, Hoste, Lang, Wegelius, Aerts and then the question is do they give Lloyd a shot or do they throw Van Avermaet in there in the hope he might get a stage win even without a lot of support (similar to McEwen’s situation last year).
ja
Yes, there was an announcement early in the season that Gilbert would likely skip the Tour. Definitely looking like it, there.
Interesting to see what Lloyd can do in the mountain stages and there are a few stages that might give Gilbert an opportunity.

by 














![This is funny on so many levels. [Html should open bigger]](http://cdn3.sbnation.com/fan_shot_images/239959/flagged_small.jpg)


