Il Spettatore di Spoltore
Bummer news of the week (IMHO) comes from a predictable source -- ASO -- who have left Team LPR off the invite list for the Ardennes classics La Fleche Wallonne and Liege-Bastogne-Liege. This officially shuts Danilo Di Luca out of the scene, despite winning all three races over a three-year period back in his Liquigas days. So far LPR doesn't make the cut at Amstel Gold either.
Very little has been said about why, or whether this is the last word. Recall, LPR were left off the wildcard list back in February, for slightly unclear reasons. The official standards have to do with "sporting, legal, administrative and ethical" matters, and there was much speculation that LPR simply had not paid into the UCI Biological Passport Program, though their manager insists they had. That leaves sporting, legal and administrative problems as the remaining possible culprits. Hopefully there will be more discussion of this, but I am skeptical that there will.
Danilo Di Luca, il Killer di Spoltore, is a longtime personal favorite rider. His birthplace in Abruzzo is near my ancestors' turf, and the history of famous Abruzzese in the peloton is pretty short. There is Di Luca, and there is Vito
Taccone, il Camoscio d'Abruzzo -- the Abruzzo chamois (pictured). Taccone was a local legend, something of a similar rider to Di Luca in terms of his punchy classics-level climbing prowess, and famous around southern Italy for making the grade in yet another northern-dominated sport. Taccone won the 1961 Giro di Lombardia and a fistful of Giro stages, though his association with the maglia rosa was brief. Taccone anointed Di Luca his cycling legacy heir, which seemed like a good idea when the latter was winning the kinds of races that had once suited the former. Unfortunately, Taccone's other legacy was a temperamental behavior in races and a conviction shortly before his death last year for selling counterfiet clothes. There is a subtle consistency to being a mezzogiornese interloper, a troublemaker in races, and a scofflaw in real life, though there's something to be said for the rule of law, at least outside Abruzzo. Anyway, nicknaming him after a goat native to the Gran Sasso d'Italia sounds about right.
Di Luca's career seems to be tailing off in a similar way. The Killer hit his stride at age 28 with a Pro Tour overall title in 2005, buttressed by wins at Amstel, La Fleche, and Pais Vasco, followed by an even more spectacular season in 2007 highlighted by his only Monument (LBL) and grand tour (the Giro, natch) wins. From then, his shady association with Carlo Santuccione cost him a few months off the bike, his job at Liquigas, and now his ability to get invited to races he once won. Presumably Di Luca will find a more legitimate way to get on with life than his cycling forebear, but his career seems to be grinding to a slow, bitter halt.
Alas, there is still the Giro. One of the coolest things I saw all last season was the three-man attack LPR executed on Monte Pora in stage 19 of the Giro, when Di Luca and Paolo Savoldelli escaped on the descent of the Passo del Vivione and joined teammate Giario Ermeti, who was up the road in a break. Di Luca took second behind break survivor Vasil Kiryienka, and paid for the effort the next day when he dropped 4' to the maglia rosa group over the Gavia and Mortirolo. But as tactical displays go, that was magnifico. Di Luca will likely feature at a few more Giri: d'Italia and di Lombardia. He might even get an invite to the Italian worlds team, though I'd be mildly surprised. But Di Luca is a "killer" in the sense of a guy who finishes off his rivals, a la Cunego or Valverde, whose closing speed is matched only by his tenacity (watch him claw his way to victory in Liege '07). Hopefully we will get a few more chances to see him at his best.
27 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Amstel yes!
LPR is in. Serr…, well you know the Rebellin team, was added as extra double bonus team.
Really?
The official site doesn’t have them. OK, that’s an improvement.
CQRanking.com, you complete me.
by Chris Fontecchio on Mar 26, 2009 7:08 PM EDT up reply actions
Wait, I posted because I found several older reports
saying they were in, and couldn’t reach the official site immediately. I’ll dig further.
Think they were, then...
They weren’t after the whole UCI wild card fandango. I think they’re out.
Diquiwhatsit is in, for all three, tho.
My apollywoggies
Official list here, of course, where Chris already found all the teams, but just now opened after a delay: http://www.amstelgoldrace.nl/index.php?pageId=33
I'm looking forward to Killer and LPR in the Giro
i expect them to light up those early mountain stages just to mess with those others who carefully manage their energies. Killer in the lead before the long TT would be fun.
Indeed it would
On the bright side, the exclusion from the Ardennes could mean he hits the Giro on better form for the last week. Which this year is pretty key. Well, okay, it’s key to have form the whole three weeks, but running out the third week would be bad.
Is LPR riding Trentino to prep for the Giro, then?
Would make sense...
I think it’s pretty much their only option, unless they pull down an invite to Romandie. Given the general shunning, I’d be surprised.
I know he's likeable but for my money
Fleche and L-B-L are now two races where clean riders have a slightly bigger chance of not getting ripped off by some cheating bastard.
One more small step in the right direction.
Did your favourite rider just win Montepaschi Strade Bianch Eroica Toscana? OK then.
I agree with you
It’s sad because I do like the Killer’s style, but it’s easier to ride stylishly when you aren’t wheezing your guts out just to keep up.
I don't understand this...
He was caught TALKING ON THE PHONE, right? Talking about doping?
He never failed a test, did he?
I just don’t get it. The guys great, and he’s just being shut out.
??
AKA -Bianchi Bob
What difference does the nature of the evidence make, as long as it's solid?
Is a man less guilty of murder because he was convicted based on dna or fingerprints rather than eywitness-testimony?
As for being shut out, this is an administrative version of the framepump in the spokes. The organizers don’t want guys who give their races a bad name at the start but since they are not under suspension they resort to plan B. It’s not pretty, but effective.
In my book it’s quite ok to like the guy in spite of what he’s done, how we view past and present doping is so personal, but please don’t tell me you actually believe he’s innocent?
Did your favourite rider just win Montepaschi Strade Bianch Eroica Toscana? OK then.
Good points, Jens.
I like the way Di Luca rides, but I really don’t think he’s innocent. I’d like to see more of him (especially in the races Chris mentioned), but I understand why he’s being shunned.
Not sure how I feel about Liguigas getting to all the races, though.
And then he was filmed going to visit Santuccione after hours
who in turn was filmed preparing a couple of syringes then going into a room which didn’t have a camera. Circumstantial maybe, but we can all make our own minds up on what we know. If you want a nice focussed shot of the needle going in then that’s your choice.
And
He was suspended, served his time, lost his job, and started over, just like Scarponi, Basso, etc. Should he have admitted to attempted conspiracy? Is that what we need to let him back in the game?
CQRanking.com, you complete me.
by Chris Fontecchio on Mar 27, 2009 2:23 PM EDT up reply actions
I once hoped
that these sentences would shock the riders into going clean, letting them know that when the authorities said that they really meant it this time that they actually really did mean it. I have no doubt that DiLuca did more than just visit his old friend and family doctor, but I’m happy to accept what CONI pushed for and got. He served his sentence and is back. It’s hard to argue for more when there’s a very good chance that those same races will be won by a rider who left a bag of blood containing EPO with his gynaecologist, yet whose federation and team seem not to care. And after the shambles over enrolment in the biological passport scheme earlier this year I really have no idea what that is set up to do.
Di Luca is being scapegoated
but I doubt he’s a completely innocent victim. And I speak as a big fan of Di Luca, and one who would like to see him race in the Ardennes this year.
Personally, I’m convinced by the Oil for Drugs evidence that Di Luca was getting more than just his annual flu shot from his “family doctor,” Santuccione back in 2004. I also believe, however, that other prominent riders against whom there is equally convincing circumstantial evidence of doping in the pre-biological-passport era are, unlike Di Luca, still widely welcomed at top races throughout Europe.
I give Di Luca the same (cautious) benefit of the doubt as to current clean riding that I give to any other rider participating in the biological passport.
For whatever reasons, Di Luca is a scapegoat, and I don’t think that’s really fair, anymore than it’s fair that Basso and Scarponi served suspensions for OP while others on the OP list continued to ride. It’s not fair, but that unfairness isn’t as troubling to me as it would be if I thought Basso, Scarponi, and Di Luca were innocent. Lots of riders cheated in 2004, and in 2006, and only a few have been punished for it. That’s just the way it is.
by Susie Hartigan on Mar 27, 2009 2:36 PM EDT up reply actions
As long as he keeps insulting my intelligence
with his “I went to Santu to cure my diaper-rash and booboo”-schtick I have no qualms in applauding those who stick the virtual framepump in his frontwheel of his career.
Did your favourite rider just win Montepaschi Strade Bianch Eroica Toscana? OK then.
"his only Monument (LBL)"
I thought he won Giro di Lombardia back in 2001?
OMG
You don’t know how shamed I feel right now…
CQRanking.com, you complete me.
by Chris Fontecchio on Mar 27, 2009 2:22 PM EDT up reply actions

by 











