Update on the Boonen Case

A court in Nanterre will hear the case between Tom Boonen and the Tour de France tomorrow. According to Boonen's lawyers, they will produce a document in which the ASO agreed to accept the UCI's position on Boonen's participation in this year's Tour de France. In short, they claim the ASO agreed to allow Boonen to ride. The document, a letter from the UCI to Patrick Lefevre, reportedly confirms the ASO's position to allow Boonen's participation.
Then, as we know, the ASO announced that they would not welcome the QuickStep sprinter on the grounds that his presence would "damage" the image of the race. The ASO used this same argument to exclude the Fuji-Servetto team, an argument that the sports arbitration court in Lausanne chose to uphold. L'Équipe confirms that the ASO's decision to exclude Boonen came as a consequence of the intervention of the French Sports Minister, Bernard Laporte. During the Critérium Dauphiné Libéré, Laporte announced that Boonen was not welcome at the Tour, nevermind that Boonen was then racing in France at the Dauphiné. Reportedly, Laporte had no idea the Belgian sprinter was riding the French race at the time.
Boonen's lawyers claim that the existence of the document confirming the ASO's initial willingness to allow Boonen to ride makes the organization's current position untenable. If they were willing to welcome him to this year's race, how could he now be viewed as "damaging to the race image?" So, the lawyers' argument goes, at least. It is unclear just yet whether they will win their case, of course. But if the document exists and it matches their claims, the Boonen team may have a powerful weapon to overturn his exclusion from the July party.
One more twist to the story. Bernard Laporte, the former coach of the French national rugby team, left his post as Minister of Sport today. Laporte has held the position since 2007, after supporting Sarkozy's presidential campaign. Rama Yade, a former Secretary for Human Rights in the French Foreign Ministry, has taken his place. The move is interpreted by some as a demontion for Yade, after falling out of favor with Sarkozy over her unwillingness to stand for elections to the European Union parliament.
— Source, L'Équipe.fr.
27 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Free Tommeke!
I have a sudden interest in the French court system.
Oh yeah, I remember right after Sarkozy won, Yade was everywhere, seemed to be a real rising star. I agree, it definitely seems like a demotion.
By the way do you (or anyone) know if Laporte resigned or was fired?
Laporte
From the sounds of it, he was not especially effective at his job on a number of levels. I don’t think he was fired specifically in relation to the Boonen case, though, if that’s what you’re asking. There’s an overview of some of the issues over at Le Monde.
I feel sure it was the spectacles.
So small I’m surprised he could see through them.
Adrenalina Italiana!
Let Boonen ride, damnit!
Interesting the article the other day on CN that said other European countries are not even reporting out of comp positives for cocaine. So, if Tom was French this wouldn’t be an issue!
Here is the source:
http://www.cyclingnews.com/editions/first-edition-cycling-news-june-21-2009
Or
If Tom wasn’t famous, this wouldn’t be an issue. What’s bugged me from the start…
Abruzziamo!
by Chris Fontecchio on Jun 24, 2009 4:29 PM EDT up reply actions
The unfairness in that situation bothers me as well.
Of course if Tom wasn’t famous, not only would this not be an issue, we wouldn’t know who he was to care about his participation. I change my mind on this, I think he should be allowed to ride.
well, if he wasn’t famous, he might just be sitting in a Belgian jail right now… ;)
by plinytheelder on Jun 24, 2009 7:19 PM EDT up reply actions
oh missed entire conversation below, I’m dumb
by plinytheelder on Jun 24, 2009 7:20 PM EDT up reply actions
not necessarily,
in fact, probly not. If they threw everyone they found who’d ever used coke in jail … plus don’t think you can throw someone in jail for a drug test.
Let him ride. He went to a party. He’s a party boy. Jeez …
Oy
don’t make me close comments!
Abruzziamo!
by Chris Fontecchio on Jun 24, 2009 6:07 PM EDT up reply actions
What I want to know
is if Boonen’s lawyers waved the document around shouting “perhaps THIS will refresh your memory”. I love when things like that happen in court – and according to tv it happens all the time!
cutting off the nose to spite the face
(as a disclaimer, please note that I hope boonen wins back his right to ride)
So the I guess there wasn’t much behind the assertions that he may have used coke to mask something on the WADA list then? It seemed far fetched at the time (still does), but embers like that rarely seem to self-extinguish.
by Koppenberg34 on Jun 25, 2009 8:55 AM EDT up reply actions
This case
doesn’t address that issue. It is only about whether the ASO can exclude him for “damaging the image of the race,” due to the out of competition test in Flanders. Since cocaine is not a banned substance out of competition, there is no doping sanction – or investigation – on the horizon.
NEW UPDATE
The verdict will be handed down on the 30th of June by the Nanterre Tribunal
Bah....Cavendish?!
More waiting around then.
Must be rather annoying for Boonen not knowning until then!
Adrenalina Italiana!
15:00 hours local time
We want Beans! We want Beans!
"Where there’s a will, there’s a way.": Alberto Contador, shortly after waking up from brain surgery.
Lol.. I hate beans.. If they are not in Tomatosauce
Crashdan: "Veni Vidi Vici beats Wing Kong Exchange... … and I’ll change my signature to a backwards smile for a month."
Frining "It's what he thinks.. But he always do.. I eat my shoe if he ride top 15 in le Tour" about Devolder

by 














![This is funny on so many levels. [Html should open bigger]](http://cdn3.sbnation.com/fan_shot_images/239959/flagged_small.jpg)


