How He Can Do It
Let's face it: the Vuelta is about 90% over. Valverde versus a bunch of climbers who need to make up time on him is pretty one-sided. If you (Bobo? Evans?) didn't put the hurt on him in the Sierra Nevada, chances are you won't have much better luck over shorter Puertos around Ávila. Yes, the Puerto Navacerrada is hard, but harder? Assuming everyone's up for the fight still, little should change... except to the extent Valverde can poach more bonuses.
Consequently, all eyes now turn to Sammy Sanchez, sitting at 1.10 off the pace and licking his chops. Between Samu and Glory lie a defenseless Robert Gesink, mediocre at both descending and time trialling, and of course Valverde, who is at a disadvantage, though how much of which is the question of the day. Can the madly-descending, wickedly-time-trialing Olympic Champion reverse all 70 seconds he owes to Valverde and steal the Vuelta? Let's zoom in on the three remaining important stages.
Stage 18, Talavera de la Reina -- Ávila
The longest climb of the day, the Puerto de Mijares, is early and inconsequential, except to the inevitable breakaway. By conventional wisdom, the Alto del Boqueron will be the one that matters, being last and reasonably close to the line, but it's pretty tame by the race's lofty standards. Then a middlin' descent and a slight uphill to the line.
Samu's Worst Case: Valverde sprints for the bonus while Sammy gets nothing.
Samu's Best Case: I dunno... more than three riders survive the breakaway and prevent any bonuses. Hard to see something more dramatic here.
Prediction: The best case. Valverde would be under pressure to send his team after the inevitable break, but with the harder stage to follow, he'll probably accept a stalemate. Sammy isn't exactly a dead duck in a sprint, after all.
Stage 19, Ávila -- San Ildefonso (La Granja)
Sammy's big chance. Incidentally, history isn't much of a guide. When Sammy went berserk at the 2007 Vuelta, the stage from Ávila finished atop Alto de Abantos -- irrelevant to this stage -- and his big downhill adventure was three days earlier around Granada. In that latter event, which is somewhat comparable, Sammy (and Triki Beltran) put 24" into Carlos Barredo and Igor Anton, and 41" into the main cluster of climbers (Menchov, Sastre, Evans, etc.). That day the locale was the Alto de Monachil, 8km at over 8%, compared to the Puerto de Navacerrada, 10km at more like 7% or so. I have no idea how to handicap two distinct descents, but would hazard a guess that those 40" Sammy stole back in '07 is in the same ballpark.
Samu's Worst Case: He's descending like mad just to catch Valverde... only to lose the sprint and another 20 seconds.
Samu's Best Case: Puts a minute into the field and takes the 20 second bonus as well. In other words, he descends straight into Gold.
Prediction: I'll split the baby... Sammy narrows the gap to 20". I can see him taking half a minute or so. Dunno if the bonuses will still be available, though there's a strong chance of it given the fact that it's the last hard stage, and it's definitely hard. So give Sammy the stage and the bonus. Valverde will get a lesser bonuse to save his jersey, for now.
Stage 20, Toledo ITT
28 km, more or less flat. Not much to add.
Samu's Worst Case: Even with Valverde.
Samu's Best Case: Stage win and gold jersey.
Prediction: Sammy wins the stage and takes Gold by less than 10 seconds. CrAzY? Maybe, though remember, I'm basically predicting losing the Editors' League, so this isn't something I do lightly. Sanchez put 18" into Valverde in the earlier ITT -- a flat 30km -- and he has peaked late in past Vueltas. So that 18" might be more of a floor than a ceiling.
Translation: It may be down to a two-man race, but we still have a very, very tense week ahead. Incidentally, the closest Vuelta in history was 1984, when Eric Caritoux beat Alberto Fernandez by six seconds. Believe it or not, this record could be in play.
21 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
great post chris!
you know, if sammy manages to prove chris correct, it might actually make up for my disgust at being forced to watch valv.piti race…and, the 89 tour aside, it would be the biggest grand tour steal of all time. well, that i can think of anyway.
"well...you live in england so: you love the rain. loves the queen. hates cycling. based on mr bean had a tremendous amount of humour. all ride in a mini cooper. all getting drunk before the age of 12. getting drunk at least 3 times a day."- frinking, 7/9/09
Clearly an effort to jinx the opposition in the Ed's league
I would like to say that the opponents are so aware of SamSan’s ability that they will never let him get a meter but he has just ridden away from people in the past. I suppose the big question is how technical the descents are? That will determine how much time he can actually get. Gesink feels like the potential looser here, not Valverde though
The great thing about descending ability
everyone knows what’s coming, and nobody can do anything about it. Well, except put a major hurt on him on the climb, which is a huge tossup.
ABRUZZIAM...uh oh
by Chris Fontecchio on Sep 14, 2009 6:32 PM EDT up reply actions
Have to agree with our friend from the Great White North.
Plus Valverde’s a decent descender as well; it’s not like Samu gets to just ride away from him like he would Gesink.
Plus he can throw down a mean TT under pressure: I do not automatically give Sam San the ITT stage.
Plus The Green Bullet’s team is a lot better.
And I am rooting for Samu too.
It can happen-but it would be an upset. Somehow Valverde’s gotta crack a little for it to happen.
Then there’s the what I’ll call the Cadel-Evans’s-too-worried-about-Bert factor: What if, like Cattle on Mt Ventoux in this year’s Dauphine where Evans was too focused/worried about Contador that he let Valverde give him the slip and so lost the race, Valverde does the same by over-focusing on Samu and so let’s someone like Evans to steal the win? Nah I can’t see it either as Valverde’s team will cover anything like that.
What's was it someone posted a few days ago.... + 436,245
This time for Sammy taking the necessary time in the ITT.
No horn, watch for finger.
Thanks for surprising the finale.
I was too lazy to go look up the final important stages on my own.
I think he deserves to win
Even though I’m a not a fan of any particular rider.
Some people are born to be spectators, some people are born to make a spectacle and some are born to be mere fans.
The descent off Nevacerado didn't look to unreasonable
I mapped it out on Google Earth at one point. It’s fairly long, and not very technical, at least from sat photos. A couple of sharp twists near the top. If it’s a straight forward as it appears, does SamSan’s advantage decrease? He seems to really excel on technical drops. I could be misreading this descent as well… But then that’s the point of this arena right? Toss out ideas and opinions and see who chops em up.
by Christopher See on Sep 14, 2009 7:37 PM EDT reply actions
Valverde is quite the techy rider....and does much better in techy TT's and descents soooo
….techy drops would be a wash between Valverde and Sanchez
I say no change to the GC
Samu will move up but I dont think he will even pass Gesink.
Sammy Sanchez lost this race when Frank Schelck had to abandon
Frank accidentally taking down AV was his last hope, but maybe the ghost of schlecking will appear!
"On a personal level, I have never had admiration for him and I never will"
~AC about LA, me about Johan "drama queen" Bruyneel
LOL
That is officially the most gratuitous Schlecking reference ever. Well played.
You see how calm Vaughters is? That’s because he’s really one giant seething ball of Evil inside. With like, extra Evil.
Nice, Chris
This post goes precisely to the crux of what’s cool about pro racing this week.
Intriguing and fun to think about. Right on time. Data, plus a reading of the tea leaves.
A mind game
is what we will witness from now on, that’s because the GC contenders are equally tired and vulnerable.
Their mental toughness will be the deciding factor. In his moment of weakness (his long awaited bad day), Valverde showed, on the climb to La Pandera, that he is the strongest. He also happens to have a strong team.
Samuel can definitely move up to second place but he will not take the lead away from Balaverde.
IMHO, the real question is: Who will take 3rd place?
Some people are born to be spectators, some people are born to make a spectacle and some are born to be mere fans.
If Sanchez Wins
A ton of credit has to go to him, his DS and his team for staying cool and limiting his losses on Stage 13. Normally, you see a guy dropped on the final climb and it’s over (Danielson, Cunego). SamSan managed the race beautifully and turned a race-ending day into a minor loss.
There’s a video on it somewhere, though that somewhere is no longer YouTube.
-Cosmo
http://cyclocosm.com
Head down, elbows out since 2005
I dunno
Gesink is not that bad a descender. He did well in coming back to the front in the descent on the stage where De La Fuente donated Valverde 8 seconds(The Fuji boys are looking for goodwill, who else noticed the short pull Cobo did for Valverde during his clawing back to Gesink?). Sure, he lost Paris-Nice 2008 on a descent. When he was 22 years old!
I missed Sanchez finest hours as a descender but in last year’s TdF there was a downhill right before the finish (Augustyn took the shortcut) and everybody was convinced Sanchez would gain time. He took a couple of seconds but eventually came in behind the top favorites.
Plus, Rabo has a really good team too. Not the uphill train kind of team but more than capable of protecting Gesink. And Lars Boom will win the final TT so no 20 bonus seconds for Samy there.
On the other hand, my evil-kanevel garden gnome bet was Samu-Valv-Gesink so I’ll be happy either way. ;-)
De FIETS en anders NIETS
Both Sammy and Valverde are favorites of mine so I would be happy to see them one-two which could happen. I personally don’t see Sanchez making up the time in these stages. Valverde has looked pretty sharp and strong and they are compatriots after all. I think Sammy’s desire will be focused on making time in anyway he can, but primarily over Gesink. If he catches Valverde, then bonus for him. I see Valverde winning the Gold jersey and I’ll be happy about that. With the stages left, I would say it’s more Valverde and Gesink’s positions to lose than Sammy’s to gain.
D for 3 and now goal for 21 years, of course I'm a goaltender apologist.

by 












