Watching Women's Worlds: Bronzini, she is fast

The women’s worlds race is one of my favorite days of the entire cycling year. Every year, I find me some video, eat the perfect pre-race meal (fish tacos, yes!), and settle in for some bike racing. I’ve yet to be disappointed. On paper, the Geelong course looked perfect for the women’s race, offering just enough opportunity for the attacking riders while still keeping the hopes of the sprinters alive. And so, it turned out to be. The race came down to a sprint, just as the U23 and men’s races did, but not until the very end did the sprinters have their chance.
Katheryn Curi Mattis got the fun job of riding off the front for something like 100 kilometers. Her escape earned Mattis the prize for most aggressive, and the former U.S. national time trial champion looked silly strong, the kilometers turning inexorably over. The U.S. women did what they could with this course, with both Amber Neben and Evelyn Stevens attacking the climbs on the final laps, but the climbs didn’t offer them much advantage, and Shelly Olds didn’t have the speed for the finale. You have to work with what you have, and the U.S., who have steadily risen to a high level in the world rankings over the past few seasons, did what they could.
Behind Mattis, Emma Pooley of Britain showed her usual feistyness. Really, the other girls must be thinking she doesn’t like them or something. Never one to sit on, Pooley attacked repeatedly on the climbs. There was never quite enough road for Pooley to escape, though it wasn’t for lack of trying. Was the British tactic for Pooley to make the race hard, and set up Nicole Cooke’s late attack? Or, did Pooley
hope to score a Double Rainbow? Either answer is possible, which ensured that no one could ignore Pooley’s attack. My favorite Pooley moment came when she attacked on the climb, and overtook Katheryn Curi Mattis. Mattis must be one of the tallest women in the field, and Pooley, well, the British climber is definitely not tall.
Nicole Cooke very nearly gave the British team a second gold medal to match Pooley’s crono success. Cooke laid out a late move on the descent, which Judith Arndt joined. Gutsy, this attacking on the descent. Arndt always makes the finale at Worlds, but she hasn’t the speed of a rider like Cooke. If the two made it the line, it was almost certainly Cooke’s race to win, when the two riders went free. Arndt won me over with the one-finger salute in 2004, so in the two-up with Cooke, I was cheering for the German. Oh, Judith, how I wish you had a sprint. Really, I thought they had the race won, Cooke and Arndt.
Was it me, or did the Canadians seem to materialize out of nowhere in the finale? Wham, there they were, chasing, and chasing hard. To some degree, the sprinters owe their shot to the hard work from the two Canadian riders in the final kilometers. They did serious damage to the gap on Cooke and Arndt. If the Italians made an error in their race tactics, it may have been here, where Guderzo and Cantele seemed to disappear at a crucial moment. The Italians failed to cover the Arndt-Cooke move, then did not seem to have the legs to chase for the sprint. It was an odd moment of weakness from a team that otherwise showed formidable strength. Maybe they simply viewed the Arndt-Cooke move as a distraction, and by then, believed that the sprint would come.
And come it did. Vos! Vos! Vos! ARRRGGHH! Vos! ARRRGGGHHH!
That’s the fourth road race silver medal for Marianne Vos. Heartbreaker. Vos led out the sprint from way out, likely believing that Arndt and Cooke would stay away. Vos, she always takes responsibility. I like that about her. In this race, she had solid support from her Dutch team, who did serious work throughout the late laps of the race. In a post-race interview, she admitted that she likely worked too hard on the climbs, and indeed, Vos covered several moves from Pooley when she might have profited from letting others do the work.
But that isn’t the sort of rider that Vos is. She races for it, and much of the time, those efforts bring her the big victories. As Teute told us, "everything is Vos territory." A rider who wins as much as Vos can’t expect anyone to help her, as well she knows, and her long sprint was a gallant effort to take another rainbow.
This Bronzini, she is fast, no? This worlds race offered my first chance to see Giorgia Bronzini sprint on video. Whoa, girlfriend’s speedy. Little wonder she already has a rainbow jersey in the Points race. In her post-race comments, Bronzini said she told
herself, "wait, wait, wait," and wait she did. Bronzini came off the wheel of Emma Johansson at the 50 meter mark and opened nearly a bike length on second placed Vos. Impressiva.
Emma Johansson looked to hit a camera with her helmet along the barricades, but stayed up and took third from the grasp of Nicole Cooke. Vos closed the door along the barricades a bit there on Emma J, though it was a gradual drift and likely didn’t change the outcome. As they crossed the line, Emma reached out to give Marianne a little pat, as if to say, sorry girl, you almost had it.
For the second year running, then, the Italians take home the rainbow. Maybe next year, they can skip the fire crotch shorts. Like Christmas, the women’s Worlds race only comes once a year. Geelong threw a lovely race, especially for the women, as the rolling terrain made for suspenseful racing. Also, I always like a waterfront bike race. Let’s do it again soon, shall we?
Photos: Getty.
59 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Favourite Race of the Championships
Although both the Mens and the Womens were both entertaining, I enjoyed this race slightly more than the mens, particuarly as I thought Cooke had it in the bag, then Vos shows up to spoil the party, but is upstaged out of nowhere by Bronzini; fantastic race.
Interesting point re: Italian tactics in the finale...
…and yet they won b/c the Canadians saved them. I was surprised.
Ha!
As they crossed the line, Emma reached out to give Marianne a little pat, as if to say, sorry girl, you almost had it.
Nice alternative interpretation :) In the threads, we were all sure she was mad.
In happy Gavia-world
it is inconceivable that she in fact said something along the lines of “WTF you cheating dutch bitch!?” even though that was probably closer to reality. In Emma’s defense she was actually pretty quick to re-tract her first angry comments after the swedish coach had reviewed the replay and concluded that Vos didn’t do much wrong.
Eh
Well, I didn’t have time to look at the post-race comments, and from the camera angle, I couldn’t tell.
Vos definitely gave Emma J the squeeze there on the barricades.
As a side note
I intentionally don’t read all the live threads and post-race comments before I write these kind of things. I’d rather not parrot back the comments other people have already made.
It wasn't the comments from us
Emma J made some sort of protest afterwards about being squeezed out, then later withdrew it. That’s why we all assumed she wasn’t being nicey nicey at the end
Ah, didn't see the news about that
I did watch the replay a couple times, though, looking at Vos’s move. It was, hmm, gradual, but definitely a squeeze.
It was a squeeze
but not in the Renshaw first-find-your-opponent-then-squeeze way, more that she took a diagonal line all through the sprint. She had to cut across from the left hand side of the road to get past Cooke and Arndt, then just never straightened up. I’m not sure what Emma J really thought about it, because when she was being nicey-nicey and withdrawing her protest afterwards she also apologised to the spectator for hitting his hand and hoped he was OK.
oh, i agree
i think it was within the rules sort of barricade sprinting, but barricade sprinting all the same.
apologising to the spectator was weird
But then again, Lieselot Decroix aplogised to the guy who stepped out in front of her & Marianne, sending her to hospital with head injuries, in one of the Classics (RVV). These women, they are very polite
by Sarah Connolly on Oct 8, 2010 12:12 PM EDT up reply actions
Where are the Italians during the season?
they don’t do a lot? Yet they win the last 3 of 4 world Champs?…
I like bikes!!!
Bec*
Bronzini's had a really good season
albeit with a lot of seconds, thirds & fourths as much as wins. She’s just won two stages in Toscana though.
"What happened in British Cycling, a lot of people doubted me. I've come back, got this victory, and done it my way." - Adam Blythe after his first pro win at Circuit Franco Belge
Oh
I remember Giorgia. In easier races she had a large black-clad Dutch roadblock to get around.
"Good thing I never said out loud that I was pulling for France, before this all started." -Mark Blacknell
by Chris Fontecchio on Oct 5, 2010 6:04 PM EDT up reply actions
Actually, she's been less good than previous years.....up until September!
She has a bad start, being taken out in a crash in the track worlds, so she couldn’t defend her track rainbows, but while she’s been on the podium all year, she must’ve had times when she was v frustrated….. all better now, mind!
by Sarah Connolly on Oct 8, 2010 12:13 PM EDT up reply actions
Individually they don't race on the strongest teams
At Worlds they collectively have a strong team and by the looks of it a very cohesive one. Bronzini for instance wins a lot of sprints but in races where she goes up against Ina, Wild and Vos etc. she doesn’t have the same quality team behind her as her opponents. That is one theory.
Cantele's all but vanished on HTC this year...
"What happened in British Cycling, a lot of people doubted me. I've come back, got this victory, and done it my way." - Adam Blythe after his first pro win at Circuit Franco Belge
Yeah, she has.
LOL, which might be why she transferred to Garmin-CervĂ©lo for next year. Maybe she wasn’t a great fit with the German duo Arndt and Teute – certainly, those two have raced together a long time.
HTC had a smaller squad this year
11 down from 13, and they concentrated a lot on the US in the early part of the season, sending teams of just two or three to some European races.
yeah, I think that had a big impact
also on the type of races they focused on
"What happened in British Cycling, a lot of people doubted me. I've come back, got this victory, and done it my way." - Adam Blythe after his first pro win at Circuit Franco Belge
I can think of a few times
I’ve seen her racing in Italy almost by herself, getting into the early break then being caught and not being able to do anything else.
Agreed
Also, they seem to all really get up for the Worlds, like it’s a huge target of their season. Cantele said it was a big goal for them, anyway. I do think they do a really good job of racing together on the day, too. The past three worlds Cantele has spent a lot of time off the front, for ex.
US media coverage is pathetic, as usual
Even cycling publications with an on-line presence haven’t bothered to interview American riders for their take on the race.
Too bad van Vleuten punctured in the last round
She could have been very useful for Vos in the true finale. Vos did manage to equal the Longo-record of 5 consecutive podium finishes on WC. But a gold would be nice for a change!
Robert Gesink on the difference between football and cycling: "For us it's a lot harder to get yellow"
Yeah
That was a big loss for Vos, I think. Van Vleuten might have been able to give Vos an easier ride to the line. That was a long ass sprint, and Bronzini was tucked in there the whole way, just waiting. Good tactics from Bronzini there, for sure.
Oh, yes, yes, yes
My bet was for a late AVV attack, as chasing her would’ve helped Vos… sadly not to be…. but her whole season was superb – albeit with some odd luck – misdirected in l’Aude, puncturing here…
by Sarah Connolly on Oct 8, 2010 12:15 PM EDT up reply actions
Great race - but I was puzzled by Pooley
Thought she had the legs to get away on the climb as she was so much faster than anyone else. Whether she could have held it the whole way down, dunno, but she certainly could have forced a winning selection.
I wonder if it was more than team tactics (setting up for the best person) – maybe it was “I’ve got a gold, lets try to get someone else one”. Any thougths?
Good write up Gav, by the way
Warning... not everything I say should be taken entirely seriously
Pooley really needs to get to the line solo or she loses
I think they recognized that the climbs were to short for her to get a big enough gap, especially considering the distance to the finish, and decided to place their bets on Cooke. Almost worked too
It was pretty obvious last year that no-one was going to let her get away on the climbs
so I don’t know how we were all suckered into believing that she could do it on those little pimples in Geelong. If you can see a replay then look at the huge crowds that appear on her wheel when they hit the hills.
I think it was both for Pooley
That is, she was trying where she could – if she got the right break free, then she’d ride. At the same time, her toughening tactics helped Cooke. Much of the time, though, Pooley had a faster finisher on her wheel when she went – at least twice, it was Marianne Vos who covered Emma P. No way Emma wins that one. Everyone wanted to cover Pooley, but only one of those breaks late in the day had any collabo. Then, it was caught on the descent anyway.
I noticed on the last lap..
heading up the 1st “pimple” she was on the front, and kept turning around, looking behind her, and then actually slowed for cooke to catch up.. further round the course, Cooke took off..
I like bikes!!!
Bec*
by Bec on Oct 6, 2010 4:14 AM EDT up reply actions
think she needed to go earlier than last lap
basically do what she did at plouay – help a smaller group get away and build a lead then drop them – far better chance to ride away from 3-4 than from 10-20
that said I think she did the best she could in softening up the field for cooke – very nearly worked too
I think team tactics
because she never really attacked as hard as she could. Plouay and the ITT showed that the all new Pooley-2010 can gain mucho time on the flat, when she goes…. but I think it was British Cycling politics, to ride for Cooke, and a feeling that she had a gol, give Cooke a go (odd, in a year where Emma has been in the form of her life, and Cooke’s only been in contention at Fleche Wallonne this year). Still can’t see what letting her at least have a try would’ve lost, given Armitstead & Cooke were still up there. Ah, well, if only…. I never understand BC tactics – at least it wasn’t as bad as the men’s 09 RR….
by Sarah Connolly on Oct 8, 2010 12:18 PM EDT up reply actions
From the last hill it was 6 km flat into a headwind,
not ideal for a featherweight on her own to hold off the peloton.
Wow
I had no idea until I saw that picture that Vos lost half a leg in the sprint. Really, I don’t see what Emma was complaining about, what with that little tap on the noggin.
"Good thing I never said out loud that I was pulling for France, before this all started." -Mark Blacknell
by Chris Fontecchio on Oct 5, 2010 6:06 PM EDT reply actions
Just thought I'd provide a link to the most gorgeous photos of the women's race.
The same site has equally beautiful shots of all the other races too.
>http://networkedblogs.com/8HgAG
"How strange it was to see men doing something beautiful. Something pointless and elegant." Tim Winton, 'Breath'
This race made me want to see more women's races
Must admit that I don’t read Monty or Gav much as I should. Hadn’t really watched a women’s race since I was in Stuttgart three years ago.
But, yeah, this is just good.
It’s a little like WNBA. I maybe the only guy I know who likes it, and I like it because they’re at the level I was in my 20s and early 30s. No superhero worship or superhero ego. These girls must be worlds better than I would have been but the distances — 125 km or so — are so much more relatable. I think most of us can imagine doing this, and it’s just a lot of fun.
Vos never ceases to amaze me...
What an incredible sprint leading to the final. All the more impressive as it isn’t as if she’s got a classic sprinters physique.
From how I see it, Bronzini owes her medal to Vos. Had Vos not gone to catch Arndt & Cooke, it is likely Cooke would be WC right now.
Frankly I’m not all that impressed with Bronzini. I’ve been in races like this where the whole field is willing to forego a chance at a result solely to try and get one rider to make the move. Certainly it can work, but it is that “we’ll let her do it” mentality that I don’t care for.
In her defense
the italians are on the front pulling for Bronzini when Vos decides to go. Maybe not fast enough to get the job done but they are trying to do their part from the looks of it.
Yes, they were there, I think
The camera angle there was hard to see, but I did see a couple blue jerseys on the front at the end.
Letting the strongest rider do most of the work?
Sounds like normal racing to me.
Badger, badger, badger, badger, badger, badger...
by TheFigurehead on Oct 6, 2010 10:37 AM EDT up reply actions
The stakes are different here...
because if Vos doesn’t sprint, then Bronzini and the rest of the field can forget any chance of the gold or even the silver medal.
So to be willing to do nothing but sit in when doing so can likely cost you even being on the podium is daft imo.
It reminds me of last year’s men’s RR where the two best teams, Italy and Spain, were willing to basically forego any chance at winning the race, solely to cover Cancellara. Ditto for this year’s Paris-Roubaix where the bunch seemed to do nothing but sit on Boonen while Cancellara rode away comfortably.
Yes, but still
This is normal racing, gambling is involved. Sometimes it works, and sometimes it doesn’t.
Badger, badger, badger, badger, badger, badger...
by TheFigurehead on Oct 6, 2010 12:52 PM EDT up reply actions
For sure
It’s the game element of bike racing. Maybe Vos should have waited to see if the Italians would drag her closer to Cooke, or if someone else would lead it out. Obviously, she thought they wouldn’t and her best chance was to go for it herself. Bronzini made the opposite calculation – I’ll wait and see if someone else leads it out. It was maybe an easier choice for Bronzini also – Unlike Vos, she probably knew she couldn’t win by going early. The calculations in that finish made it an interesting sprint to watch.
laughs....hey I wish I could succeed racing that way but alas...
I picked good parents for TT’ing & climbing, but not sprinting :-)
Either way I look @ it..
It sucked and I was devastated, my heart sank when Cooke & Arndt got caught in the last 20m, they really threw the cards down when they went, was a great move, they did the work, I really wished it paid off! I wanted Arndt to win, and she tried so hard to get there, she really had a crack, she would be the 1st to admit, she is not a sprinter either!
I however could probably be a sprinter!? However..I would struggle with the 120km or so prior to the sprint..Cant climb or TT to save myself…
Im blaming the Canadians for doing the work before they hit the finish straight.. grrrrrrrr… Im still bummed about it!
I like bikes!!!
Bec*
I still think Cooke was looking at Arndt way too much to really expect to have won.
I know she said she had nothing left & I believe her. But I still think it might have been different had she gone for it a fraction earlier.
"What happened in British Cycling, a lot of people doubted me. I've come back, got this victory, and done it my way." - Adam Blythe after his first pro win at Circuit Franco Belge
There was a point at the start of the final stright, where Cooke came round Arndt, & visibly hesitated
That was the magic moment when she could have gone, but didn’t. The theory I like best is that she didn’t have her usual confidence, after a bad 2010/end of 2009, and so wheras in ‘08 she wouldn’t have thought about it, this time she thought too much
by Sarah Connolly on Oct 8, 2010 12:22 PM EDT up reply actions

by 














