Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Indy 500: 'Greatest Spectacle In Racing' Set For Sunday

The Plot Thickens: LeMond Subpoened in Armstrong Inquiry

According to an article in the New York Daily News, Greg LeMond has received a subpoena to appear before the Grand Jury in the Armstrong doping investigation. LeMond is requested to appear in Los Angeles on 30 July. Among other things, LeMond has several taped telephone calls which spill some sordid details from the Amstrong story. The investigation is moving quite quickly now, and in recent days news has emerged that a Grand Jury awaits testimony from several people who have received subpoenas. So far, no riders have been called to testify, though lawyers for several Americans currently riding the Tour have been contacted. Read more.

Also today, a Washington Post article solved what was for me a central mystery of this case so far. That is, yes, Landis said inflammatory things, but how did a federal investigation come together so quickly? According to the article, the whole story began as an investigation into the doings of Rock Racing. Though not mentioned in the article, the focus on Rock Racing may have resulted from the Kayle Leogrande case and the federal investigation into Joe Papp's alleged role as dealer to the stars. Papp reportedly imported dope from China and sold it to various riders in North America, and perhaps beyond. Read more.

Comment 88 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from Podium Cafe

The Session: Sweet Anticipation

Feb 2012 by Jen See - 4 comments

The Session: Days of the Dope

Feb 2012 by Jen See - 85 comments

Contador Press Conference: Analysis

Feb 2012 by Jen See - 234 comments

Contador banned for two years

Feb 2012 by Jens - 586 comments

Comments

Display:

wouldn't be surprised to see coerced testimony

and tax evasion be the charges that stick.

Remember kids, Lemond has Stephanie McIlvain telling him on tape that Armstrong admitted to usind PEDs in that Indiana hospital room back in 96—testimony that she did NOT give in the SCA trial—mostly because she has a kid with medical problems and needed to stay employed with Oakley. (This is covered in detail in Walsh’s From Lance to Landis—including, iirc, a transcript of the tape).

And . . . why would Armstrong’s lawyer not have good records of when and how his client became an owner of the company that the lawyer was also an executive for?

by R Mc on Jul 16, 2010 9:11 PM EDT reply actions  

The McIlvain tape

that thingy could cause Armstrong some difficulty, I think.

by Jen See on Jul 16, 2010 9:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

The NYDN's rhetoric is interesting

For whatever reason. they have already turned on Armstrong.

by R Mc on Jul 16, 2010 9:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

broken link to the Washington Post story?

by RoadRash911 on Jul 16, 2010 10:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

But can they use the McIlvain tape, given as its recording broke the law? Maybe use it and then send LeMond to Sing-Sing as well?

pounding along in three ratios like a sonata
like a Ritter with pommelled scrotum atra cura on the step
Botticelli from the fork down pestling the transmission
tires bleeding voiding zeep the highway

by fmk on Jul 17, 2010 8:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

it could probably

be heard by a grand jury (less than fully informed speculation on my part), but definitely would never be heard in an actual trial (which we’ll never see, anyway).

by Sui Juris on Jul 17, 2010 8:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

It's not illegal under U.S. federal law for a person to record his or her own phone calls,

with or without the consent of the other party to the call.

Even if the recording violated some state law (I have no idea whether it did), only federal law matters in a federal prosecution.

by Susie Hartigan on Jul 17, 2010 11:32 AM EDT up reply actions  

exactly

and the state laws in question vary from place to place. Some states are one party states and you can record calls without the other person’s consent and some states are two party states. I am not sure how the reconcile this in different state courts but the tapes effect public perception alone if they are aired could be damaging enough.

by Nomer on Jul 17, 2010 11:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

This is all a waste of money.

The U.S. should not pursue these cases.

by DriftNasty on Jul 16, 2010 9:20 PM EDT reply actions  

Given how central sports metaphors are to our culture

that’s actually a highly debatable premise.

But . . . I stand by my prediction that the charges that ultimately stick against Armstrong, Stapleton, and Tailwind will be garden variety criminal racketeering, coercion, and fraud charges, not simply doping.

by R Mc on Jul 16, 2010 9:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Look up RICO

and the feds don’t take kindly to witness tampering.

by R Mc on Jul 16, 2010 10:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

wrist slapping offenses? really...

ask marion Jone how that jail time worked out for her

by roadside on Jul 16, 2010 10:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

incarceration is still just that.

locked up, and controlled. Freedom denied. Yes you may get to run out side the fence at minimum sec, but you don’t get to go home……

Anyone who has every thought a working Photojournalist had a glam job needs to rethink...

by Christopher See on Jul 17, 2010 1:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

exactly

especially since she had a seven month old infant at the time she could not be with because of jail.

by roadside on Jul 17, 2010 9:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

you could say that of just about any case

there’s always bigger fish out there. and how many gov’t resources are actually getting used up here?

"Ants don’t worry, they operate like a fantastic team, they accept obstacles and deal with them in a positive manner, they don’t complain and remain positive. An ant doesn’t work on emotion, is proactive and always chooses the ant role."

by ant1 on Jul 17, 2010 12:20 AM EDT up reply actions  

were you agains the marion jones/balco case?

"Ants don’t worry, they operate like a fantastic team, they accept obstacles and deal with them in a positive manner, they don’t complain and remain positive. An ant doesn’t work on emotion, is proactive and always chooses the ant role."

by ant1 on Jul 17, 2010 12:21 AM EDT up reply actions  

Except

This case started as a trafficking and dealing case – with a possible side order of money laundering and tax evasion – not as a sports doping case. Maybe you don’t agree that those things should be against the law, but they are as of now illegal. So, like, you gots to enforce them and stuff.

by Jen See on Jul 19, 2010 11:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

wow

really heating up!

by the way – New York Daily News? that’s awesome! seriously, great find! ;)

I'm feverished, or the way you want to spell it

by plinytheelder on Jul 16, 2010 9:31 PM EDT reply actions  

Not as good as the New York Nightly News

which died along with prohibition being abolished.

Vamos Alberto!
Quitter's People United member # 42

by Phil H. on Jul 16, 2010 9:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Vinson

The writer pushing this story at the NY Daily News co-authored a book on Roger Clemens and steroids in baseball. He’s been working this story since it started, and seems to have been given time and a free hand from his editors to chase it. Since he isn’t chasing the Tour around France, he has a bit more time to pursue it than someone like Bonnie Ford at ESPN might.

by Jen See on Jul 19, 2010 11:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

Pure speculation on my part...

but I wonder if this grinding legal stuff is not a large factor in LA’s Défaillance

His head/heart does not appear to be in the race

by RoadRash911 on Jul 16, 2010 9:58 PM EDT reply actions  

Not much.

He didn’t have it last year either.

by DriftNasty on Jul 16, 2010 9:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

wow

wish I could not have it and still get a Tour podium! ;)

I'm feverished, or the way you want to spell it

by plinytheelder on Jul 16, 2010 10:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, 3rd place sucks

Especially after years off the bike.

now sock-less and carefree.

by JustJoshinYa on Jul 16, 2010 10:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

He was ok last year.

He did not have it to win. A 3rd place 5 minutes off the lead and 4 minutes off Schleck was a hinting at this tour. If he were only a few seconds I would say different.

by DriftNasty on Jul 16, 2010 10:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

whatever

Easy to blast out ridiculousness. I can’t stand the guy and his ride last year was impressive considering his time off the bike and injury before the tour. But again…whatever.

Getting tired of all the arguments around these threads these days. Wearing on me.

now sock-less and carefree.

by JustJoshinYa on Jul 16, 2010 10:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

got that right...

Now, where’s that Festivus Pole?

now sock-less and carefree.

by JustJoshinYa on Jul 16, 2010 11:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

If the arguments continue

will you end up like this?

Vamos Alberto!
Quitter's People United member # 42

by Phil H. on Jul 16, 2010 11:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

OMG! Where do you guys get this stuff !!!!

by RoadRash911 on Jul 17, 2010 12:02 AM EDT up reply actions  

A lack of life helps

Vamos Alberto!
Quitter's People United member # 42

by Phil H. on Jul 17, 2010 12:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

phil's lack of life, or...

…the freakout?

"Ants don’t worry, they operate like a fantastic team, they accept obstacles and deal with them in a positive manner, they don’t complain and remain positive. An ant doesn’t work on emotion, is proactive and always chooses the ant role."

by ant1 on Jul 17, 2010 12:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

STFU loser

it is pretty obvious that the freak-out is a dramatic reenactment of me after the WC loss of Germany. OK not quite that bad and yes JJY I do believe it is real, that guys little bitch brother(at beginning and end of video) has numerous videos of his bro, who clearly has anger issues, freaking out over stupid shit which has made his bro quite famous for all the wrong reasons(well Youtube famous).

Vamos Alberto!
Quitter's People United member # 42

by Phil H. on Jul 17, 2010 12:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

nearly 30million views.

actually sad…damn…

now sock-less and carefree.

by JustJoshinYa on Jul 17, 2010 12:32 AM EDT up reply actions  

It is

but still pretty hilarious, so schadenfreude?

Vamos Alberto!
Quitter's People United member # 42

by Phil H. on Jul 17, 2010 12:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

Speaking of YouTube Famous

Try relaxing from worring about the TdF as “Fred Tries to Ride a Bike”

Now the question is, is this guy high on helium or what?

by RoadRash911 on Jul 17, 2010 12:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

That was quite an unpleasant experience

OK VERY unpleasant. But he seems to already have better bike handling ability than Frank Schleck.

Vamos Alberto!
Quitter's People United member # 42

by Phil H. on Jul 17, 2010 1:02 AM EDT up reply actions  

and kind of working for his teammate too

plenty impressive.

"You know if there's any contact at all Cristiano Ronaldo's gonna go down...maybe even just a puff of wind"

by agl on Jul 16, 2010 10:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Lets hope this doesn't turn into a three ring circus

like the Landis case did.

This keeps getting more serious, i’m guessing the next subpoena’s coming for Lance.

"You know if there's any contact at all Cristiano Ronaldo's gonna go down...maybe even just a puff of wind"

by agl on Jul 16, 2010 10:01 PM EDT reply actions  

I'm hoping for justice too

I wouldn’t be surprised if they summon Tyler, Hincape, Lance … everybody after the race.

I’ve been furious for years about what I believe to be LA’s lying, cheating and doping. It has soiled the race and the sport. Now that we are getting closer to justice, I’m not so keen on it. But nevertheless, we must press on. Justice must be done and we deserve a clean sport.

by RoadRash911 on Jul 16, 2010 10:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't understand how digging the doping era back up again makes the sport clean

Or are you in denial that everyone who was anyone was doping between 1991 and 2008?

Everyone who is logical has already come to the conclusion that Armstrong doped. The people that do not think he did will not believe that he did, or care if a judge or jury says so.

What are you really trying to get out of it? Do you think the millions of people who love Armstrong are going to all of a sudden hate him, and you’ll join with them in a group hug? It’ll just be a more violent and vehement denial and defense.

by whistlingmountain on Jul 16, 2010 11:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

it wont be good for the sport

im not sure inaction’s good either. But i think its the legal matters with the doping, not the sporting idea of him cheating, that makes this a problem right now. Lose-lose scenario, if lance goes down, will his haters feel vindicated? I don’t think they will.

"You know if there's any contact at all Cristiano Ronaldo's gonna go down...maybe even just a puff of wind"

by agl on Jul 16, 2010 11:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

It's important because

it’s pointless to have rules without enforcement.

by Sui Juris on Jul 16, 2010 11:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

+1

no gifts

"Ants don’t worry, they operate like a fantastic team, they accept obstacles and deal with them in a positive manner, they don’t complain and remain positive. An ant doesn’t work on emotion, is proactive and always chooses the ant role."

by ant1 on Jul 17, 2010 12:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

Lots to learn

Vamos Alberto!
Quitter's People United member # 42

by Phil H. on Jul 17, 2010 12:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

ok someone has to say it

I'm feverished, or the way you want to spell it

by plinytheelder on Jul 17, 2010 1:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

Restated

"Thanks again, Floyd Landis, Yellow Jersey Wearer: Nuisance Category"

by PopUp Rolen on Jul 17, 2010 7:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

thanks

I'm feverished, or the way you want to spell it

by plinytheelder on Jul 17, 2010 9:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

want a cleaner sport

(not in denial and not naïve about it).

You could also make a case that Lance is a philanthropic hero, beat cancer, great athlete, etc. Believers will believe, others may be differently informed. This judicial process probably won’t be pretty. Tired of convincing people one way or the other. In the end, I really don’t want to argue about it… and would rather enjoy the next stage…

by RoadRash911 on Jul 16, 2010 11:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

i think this will be much bigger than the landis case

which was “only” between him and the cycling authorities. this is federal. even if it doesn’t go any further than where it is right now, it’s already bigger.

"Ants don’t worry, they operate like a fantastic team, they accept obstacles and deal with them in a positive manner, they don’t complain and remain positive. An ant doesn’t work on emotion, is proactive and always chooses the ant role."

by ant1 on Jul 17, 2010 12:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

wow, this is getting serious

That explains, at least in my mind, why LA immediately turned around after crossing the finish line today and went to the hotel

by RoadRash911 on Jul 16, 2010 11:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

There's not a lot of meat in that article...

Doesn’t really tell us if the feds are finding anything, it just tells us where they’re looking and what they COULD find. And as it admits at the end, they’re going to need more than just a few people (especially people like Landis) pointing fingers.

And bottom line, Lance can always buy a small country and live there.

So… waste of time and money IMO.

Cazzo, it's going to be a bloodbath! The Mortirolo is a horror, absolutely interminable. -- Michele Scarponi

by tgartner on Jul 17, 2010 3:18 AM EDT up reply actions  

there’s a quite lot in that article. It explains why a Federal investigation seemed to materialize so quickly (answer: it didn’t – this is a natural outgrowth of a pre-existing one), it confirms that the investigation isn’t just some pro-forma “we’re looking into it” exercise, and that this isn’t a personality-oriented crusade.

by Sui Juris on Jul 17, 2010 8:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

Well, it's informative, yes...

But to clarify… I don’t see much in there that is more damaging to Lance than what we’ve already heard. That’s not to say they won’t turn something up… but if they’ve found anything solid, they didn’t tell the Post about it. (Not that they should have.)

As for the investigation being “pro forma”… I for one never imagined it was. These are serious people. I guess I could see them launching a “pro forma” investigation if they were under pressure by public opinion, but if anything I would say that public opinion (outside of places like podium cafe) ranges from indifferent to pro-Lance.

Cazzo, it's going to be a bloodbath! The Mortirolo is a horror, absolutely interminable. -- Michele Scarponi

by tgartner on Jul 17, 2010 7:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Still can't see anything much happening

Politically, who wants to take Armstrong down in the US. And at some point, it always comes down to politics. The investigators will have their ears whispered in.

I do think though that this likely wouldn’t have happened if Armstrong had of stayed retired. Tarnishing his stellar reputation/legacy was always a huge risk – both of and on the bike. Unfortunately, his comeback was a bad idea.

moo

by Willj on Jul 17, 2010 4:10 AM EDT reply actions  

Yes, Agree - the TV sponsors seem to think so.

But I love the Lance comeback – it would be cool by me if he sticks around a while. He left the sport badly, ducking the Olympics and the Giro where his hotel would surely have been raided.

I feel the comeback is Lance trying to make the separate case that had he been able win cleanly in his peak era, he would have. I have my doubts about the current testing, but as I understand it, it is blood, hair, pee. I do not say my rationale for what Lance’ is doing is valid or honorable, and if they get him, I’m all for it, but that’s what I think he’s up to, and then also if necessary try to hide amongst the big sports PED users like A-Rod.

Yes, politics will likely come into play, and Lance is singing this tune, too. Novitsky spent millions going after baseball player Barry Bonds, so he is not in a position to back down from a career standpoint. Someone will have to slow him down soon or the US gov’t $ commitment will become large.

by rubesANdbabes on Jul 17, 2010 8:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed

When Armstrong announced he was returning, I had the same thoughts – the downside was significantly bigger than the upside. If for no other reason, than it allowed new questions to be asked. People would always whisper (well, maybe whisper like in a helicopter), but it would be in the past. I think Armstrong’s ultimate undoing will be how harsh he was with other riders and people around the sport – there are many who wouldn’t mind him seeing him get his comeuppance.

Sometimes I wonder if there was a blind eye turned (particularly to the feel-good LA story) in ‘99 to try to rejuvenate the sport after the “Tour of Shame”, and the story got to big to reign back in. ASO/UCI didn’t mind re-opening the US market.

What bothers me the most is the hue and cry over cycling, when it’s pretty obvious that PED use follows anywhere competition takes place. I love the NFL, but when it came out that a punter was using, it was obvious that most, if not all, the players in the league are using. I don’t mean that as the “everyone’s doing it” defense, it just seems that the cycling headlines are more over the top in comparison.

by Badger the Bouncer on Jul 17, 2010 9:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

The blind eye

David Walsh said in an interview with NY Velocity that this is exactly what happened.

by Jen See on Jul 18, 2010 11:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

It wouldn't have happened if they let Landis race the damn ToC.

"It's a lovely thing, feeling that momentum. If you're lucky, it's also about grace." Tim Winton

by sminer on Jul 17, 2010 11:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

"I can't believe anybody would want to take Floyd Landis to the prom." Tim Herman

    Armstrong’s lawyer Tim Herman commenting on Landis’ credibility. Personally I thought the sour milk comment would have been a better line to stick with. As in;
   " I can’t believe anybody would want to take sour milk to the prom."
    As long as Armstrong’s and his people are of the few continuing to speak on the record in this matter the press will keep going back for more comments. I’m not an armchair psychologist but I would guess this phenomenon would keep me busy and happy if I was. ;-)

Woof

by flying dog on Jul 17, 2010 7:56 AM EDT reply actions  

Sorry 'bout the link in the OP

Had trouble with the Washington Post – kept getting a stupid log in screen.

Hope it works now.

by Jen See on Jul 17, 2010 11:38 AM EDT reply actions  

random question:

who flips first?

Armstrong or Stapleton?

Because if Armstrong goes down, Stapleton will too.

by R Mc on Jul 17, 2010 1:29 PM EDT reply actions  

Stapleton

No one is going to out-stubborn Armstrong.

Vlaanderens Mooiste

by Koppenberg on Jul 18, 2010 1:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

They'll go down together (if there is any fire to the smoke)

If it is perjury that gets them – they both did it

If it is dope that gets them – Stapleton will have some trafficking violations whereas Armstrong may just have using

Both in a pretty tough spot now the feds are involved

Warning... not everything I say should be taken entirely seriously

by addict on Jul 18, 2010 4:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Huh?
So far, no riders have been called to testify, though lawyers for several Americans currently riding the Tour have been contacted.

Where did this information come from? I can’t find it in the New York Daily News story.

by Chief Commissaire on Jul 18, 2010 11:27 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Every sprint, every cobble, every mountain pass from the world of Pro Cycling

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Sorlin_small
Passo dello Stelvio - A Brief History
Unicorn_160_x_160_small
Marmottes Without Contract!

Recent FanPosts

Schermafbeelding_2012-05-09_om_14
Saturday open thread (Eurosong!)
Kelly_legs_small
Giro Stage Predictor: Stage 21
Kelly_legs_small
How time gaps in bike races work, and why breaks get caught on mountaintop finishes.
Kelly_legs_small
GIro Stage Predictor: Stage 20
Javino_small
Vlaanderen's U25 VDS: An Update and an Apology
Kelly_legs_small
Giro Stage Predictor: Stage 19
Small
Can Ryder win the Giro?
Cutenessoverload_small
Why haven't there been single-day races that resemble particularly difficult Grand Tour stages?
Bike_small
Visiting Copenhagen, any tips on renting a bike or where to ride?
Kelly_legs_small
Giro Stage Predictor: Stage 18

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Giro d'Italia Podium Cafe

Celebrate the Giro d'Italia at Podium Cafe!

Check our Giro Section for race updates, on-the-scene reports, and other hijinx.

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

Roads? Where we're going, we don't need roads
Marianne Vos tweets her collarbone x-ray!

She crashed yesterday in the Holland Hills Valkernberg Classic when a race moto got in her way (see more in the story) - but it's so very Vos-like to show us the result.  Heal-fast, Marianne!

(Photo via Vos' twitter and also on VeloNation)
cyclists - it's your fault if you get hit by a car
not quite in Dario Frigo's league . . .
Talking about women's cycling
pdc national champs ride sunday in greenville sc
Trivia time: 
1 Where's the picture shot?
2 Who's the dude riding the race bike?
3 Who's the girl riding the omafiets?

Waaay too easy for this crowd, I know.
Picture by Nieke 0562
Should I, shouldn't I? Or am I being an idiot?
Lee Rodgers Diary: A Memorable Day in Kuala Lumpur
cycle faster. do yoga. - An Evelyn Stevens video

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Farrar_and_cafe_small Chris Fontecchio

Espresso_cup_small Jen See