A Fort Worth sort of post . . . about sports journalism
At every level of sports--from the local school district getting exposed trying to quietly shoo out a coach who'd had a couple of "inappropriate relationships" with students, to the farce of Jim Tressel at Ohio State, to FIFA--we've had a strikingly uniform set of illustrations of the lesson that the link between moral behavior and sports--especially sports administration--is not automatic.
so, what's this got to do with Fort Worth, TX?
actually, you can be even more specific than that, and focus on one Fort Worth-based family (although in the older generation, you also have to include Bud Shrake . . .): the Jenkins family, specifically father Dan Jenkins and daughter Sally.
Dan Jenkins is a legend in my family because my mother went to high school with him--and before I read the story of how some teen-age sports reporters started inserting scores and stories about a fake West Texas high school team and star into the paper so they could bet on the results, I'd heard them. In fact, I heard them before the book was written. In his reporting and columns for Sports Illustrated and especially in the horrifically funny satires of NFL football (Semi-Tough and some others), Jenkins skewered the notion that sports celebrities were fit vessels for fan adulation. (And he targets the media as well).
Sally Jenkins, on the other hand--although every once in a while in her Washington Post columns she tries to summon up some of her dad's perspective--you probably already know her complicity in the production of Saint Armstrong. The very title of the first pseudo-auto-biography (it's not REALLY an autobiography of you didn't actually write it yourself), It's Not About the Bike pretty blatantly suggests that it's all about the dude riding the bike.
Is she having second thoughts about her role in the creation of the Armstrong-phenomena? Sorta. Again, you've probably read her "I really don't wanna admit that he probably lied to me" article, and if you haven't, it's easy to google.
But the point of this post is to note, sorta sardonically, that the journalistic stance called for by Gerard Vroomen in a recent blog-post in which he praises journalists like Kimmage for writing the unpopular story that risked losing access to "i bigs," was developed in American sports reporting by the dad of the woman most responsible for creating the legend of Armstrong.
And Jenkins senior developed that fundamental conviction about the potential corruptions of sports watching Texas college and high school football. (And, then, golf at Colonial Country Club, but that's a different set of stories).
12 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
A big fan of Dan's
So I give Sally the benefit of the doubt. Her personal feelings must be tearing her apart with the scrutiny she is under. What can you do when a friend, confidant and revenue creator turns out to be something other than what he seemed?
Sally Jenkins doesn't deserve the benefit of the doubt
She knows exactly what she’s doing, responding to every question about LA with “He’s a friend, and the best guy ever. And an awesome cyclist, too.” instead of actually talking about the issue. Or simply saying – “he’s a friend, and I just don’t want to speculate.” But she doesn’t – she goes on about how great he is, how nothing could ever change that, etc. At length. Ad nauseum. Now, some blame falls on the people for asking her the questions after she’s obviously shown she has no interest in approaching the matter from anything other than a personal perspective. But on the whole, it’s bullshit, and I’ve zero respect for her as a sports “journalist” as a result. You can listen to her in action here: http://thekojonnamdishow.org/shows/2011-05-26/sports-society-sally
I have friends who do unpaid political blogging
who hew far more closely to journalistic standards, including disclosing every personal connection, every-interest, any likely departure from impartiality when reporting a news issue (as opposed to an opinion piece) and clearly labeling opinion pieces or puff pieces as such. It’s really not so tough. Furthermore, they don’t, de facto, interview themselves—that is, if the byline is theirs, they don’t also double as the subject of the piece. Seems to me that people who are being paid ought to be at least as careful.
Sure, it’s a free world, and nobody is required to speculate on the veracity of a friend’s stories. (Well, not until the grand jury sends a subpoena, anyway.) But a journalist (or even a “journalist”) has to be mighty careful when switching hats. However—and this is a big “however”—even in a live broadcast, a certain amount of material can, and does, get cut. Presumably it’s a better story for the people interviewing her if they leave out the disclaimers.
"luckily for me i was born with an extremely high hemassholecrit level. no pills needed." -ant1
I agree with Sui above and noted it especially in her latest piece that I read the other day - I don't see much journalism here:
Sally Jenkins: My opinion on this stuff is colored by friendship
He’s become a good friend of mine as well as co-author, so I am obviously biased. But I’ve had a decade to decide whether he’s a jerk underneath it all, and, to me, he isn’t.
I like this one, a plea to just say no more LA pieces from her. The quotes in that link are PR (some nauseating).
As I’ve always said, my take on Lance is just that, my personal take. I try not to defend or condemn him, and I’m certainly not his mouthpiece. I just try to relate what I know about him through my personal experience with him, and my take on him is obviously colored by friendship and affection. I hope he’s clean, and I wish for him to be clean.
And she's a credentialed journalist?
Where can I get my press pass?
Sea Otter Classics (tm c R I’ll fucking sue you)
And I just didn’t like her for her lousy Heart Rate training guides (when I got my first HRM way back)
moo
that's Sally Edwards . . .
and man were those things awful . . . and I was reminded of them today by an article appearing on the interwebs on a certain ’flavor’ful website.
Just don't also
mix up your Mustangs.
"I am Superior,but I'd rather be Human" quote by Data(Star Trek NG) or Fabian Cancellara?
by frans verbiage on Jun 1, 2011 1:22 AM EDT up reply actions

by 
















