I know there has been a lots of talk recently about Team Sky's dominance of P-N and T-A (until stage 6) and how many feel that history tells us that any team dominating races like this has been doping. I have been a member of PC for a few years without making much comment but recently have been disappointed with a lot of the comments I read re. Team Sky and doping so have decided to get involved. The money the team has means being able to have riders like Uran, Henao and Porte, all who could be team leaders anywhere else, working for Froome and Wiggins, is it not this which gives the team the ability to dominate races? Brailsford talks about 15 years of success with the track team and is it not reasonable to expect this success could be transferred to the road? Anyway I found his comments interesting and would be interested in others thoughts on this and the team as a whole.